Posted by zenhussy on August 18, 2003, at 23:55:19
In reply to Lou's response to Shar's post-PT » shar, posted by Lou Pilder on August 18, 2003, at 23:42:37
> Shar,
> You wrote,[...we have no way of determining if they are obtiaining legally or an off topic...].
> I disagree with that conclusion for the only jurisdiction that I know of that has legal use of MJ is in Holland, and my daughter and her husband returned from there last year and told me about it. It is not that simple, even there. It is controlled in pubs, and amounts over personal use are illegal, as it was explained to me.
> It is my understanding that the posters advocating trying MJ do not reside in Holland. See a previous post in this thread with my answer to the medicinal question. People here are not saying that they were prescribed MJ for chemotherepy and such. On the contrary, they wrote that they should not get busted and if they were using MJ as a california chemotherpy or gloucoma victim, that was not written. Also, one of the posters has written that she is a London, England resident.
> Lou
>Lou,
Here are some links so that you can stop referring to medicinal cannabis as just being used for "glaucoma victims (and why would you ever refer to someone with glaucoma as a victim???) and chemotherapy patients.You need to be a bit more informed before tossing about such stale propaganda.
http://www.cannabisnews.com/information/
http://www.wamm.org/medicinalbenefits.htm
http://www.cannabismd.com/reports/
http://www.drugwarfacts.org/medicalm.htm
Happy reading.
zh
poster:zenhussy
thread:251973
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20030808/msgs/252025.html