Posted by Lou Pilder on March 30, 2003, at 17:01:01
In reply to Re: Lou's reply to Dinah's post-PV, posted by coral on March 30, 2003, at 16:42:59
D,
You wrote, [...there is another option: take a person'e words at face value...].
That would be fine if the words did not need clarification in order to have an understanding of whether or not the statement in question could be construed to be defaming or accusatory or other unjust inferances or haveing a need for identification in order to have an opportunity to respond accordingly. I beleive that clarification has the potential to be benifitual to a discussion, for an answer to the requst becomes additional infomation that could enhance therapeutic discussions by [...shedding more light ...] on the subject.
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:207945
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20030221/msgs/214515.html