Re: Answer?

Posted by Dr. Bob on February 5, 2003, at 20:46:26

In reply to Re: Question? » Dr. Bob, posted by Zo on February 5, 2003, at 14:31:16

> Admittedly, don't read the board as consistently as I once did
That's OK, thanks for stopping by...
> > Well, Alan had in fact taken it OK. .
>
> This seems to suggest that it is taken into consideration whether the person to whom an uncivil remark ("Get a life") was directed "takes it okay". . . the poster gets a free pass, so to speak.. .. ?
I take it into consideration, but that doesn't necessarily mean a free pass...
> Conversely, then, if the person is hurt or angered by the same (or very similar) words, then the poster has been officially Uncivil, and receives the mark in your notebook that tallies into warning/blocking. . .?
Likewise, I take that into consideration, but it doesn't necessarily mean a black mark. Sorry if this is vague, it would be nice to have a formula to plug all the factors into...
Bob

Thread

Alan blocked for 2 wks? ZeeZee 12/29/02
Re: Alan blocked for 2 wks? Dinah 12/29/02
I totally agree (nm) » Dinah ZeeZee 12/29/02
Re: Alan blocked for 2 wks Dr. Bob 12/29/02
Re: Alan blocked for 2 wks » Dr. Bob ZeeZee 12/29/02
Re: Fair enough » Dr. Bob Dinah 12/29/02
Re: Sorry Alan. Dinah 12/30/02
Re: Question? » Dr. Bob Zo 2/5/03
Re: Answer? Dr. Bob 2/5/03

Post a new follow-up

[9094]

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:Dr. Bob thread:8643
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20021128/msgs/9094.html