Posted by shar on January 20, 2003, at 20:12:45
In reply to corekting other's spelling gramar » beardedLADY, posted by OddipusRex on January 20, 2003, at 16:24:35
Here we are with comparisons, again. I'm chiming in that discussing 'ideations' is not more useful than discussing spelling, just different.
Shar
> woodent it be more usefull to discus ideations than speling?
> no disrepute to yor mitey intelectuals intent.
>
> >
> > > Scientific reasoning is a process. A person's individual reasons do not comprise sufficient rational to conclude...
> >
> > It's rationale, with an e on the end, not rational.
> >
> > >Merely considering alternatives does not comprise scientific reasoning.
> >
> > I think you mean, "Considering alternatives is not the only component of scientific reasoning." Comprise means to consist of, include, or contain, so that would read, "Merely considering alternatives does not include scientific reasoning." Comprise is used incorrectly in the first sentence, too.
> >
> > > My observation is that Hsuing published research conclusions profering...
> >
> > That's proffering, with two efs.
> >
> > I hope this helps.
> >
> > Bearded Lady
> > defender of the English language
>
>
poster:shar
thread:8860
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20021128/msgs/8911.html