Psycho-Babble Administration | about the operation of this site | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: Where do we draw the line? » Dr. Bob

Posted by beardedlady on July 10, 2002, at 13:59:49

In reply to Re: Where do we draw the line?, posted by Dr. Bob on July 10, 2002, at 12:18:56

> > You must rely on intention in order to issue any PBC or block. When issuing it, you have determined that the poster's intention was negative. Otherwise, there'd be no need for a PBC or block.
>
> I disagree. And have tried to explain this before. I consider the perspective of the supportee more important than the perspective of the supporter:

-----------
Fine. Disagree. Your third sentence is a non sequitur. It has nothing to do with our original discussion of intent and was, in fact, a point only recently made.
-----------

> And someone can mean well, but still post something uncivil: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20020627/msgs/6060.html

-----------
I don't think that's ever been a topic of debate. But why are you posting a URL that simply duplicates what you're saying? It doesn't add context and it doesn't prove anything except that you said it before, which isn't in question.
-----------

> > Before I finish here, I just want to say that I am disappointed that you issued someone a block for repeating something I said. You determined that she had a negative intention, and you determined that mine was somehow not negative.
>
> Sometimes intention does enter into it. But isn't that how you think it should be?

------------
Yes, Dr. Bob, intention should enter into it. But no, that's not how I think it should be. It should be fair. The point you keep ignoring is that one person repeated my exact post, and you determined hers was negative and mine was not.
------------

>
> > As regards Lou's endless experience and ... (TCA West), there's no need to give an example.
>
> Well, it's hard to get specific without specifics...

---------
WHOA! TALK ABOUT OUT OF CONTEXT! My next bunch of sentences told you to look at ANY and ALL of their posts for an example, even explained what I meant. What I'm not willing to do, however, is supply the URLs of all the posts; it would be time consuming and futile. And you're obviously not even willing to look into it.
----------

> > It's been mostly fun, but it's getting uncomfortable and unfriendly (and it feels somehow anti-woman, though I can't explain that feeling), and I have some fresh bing cherries to eat and a beautiful daughter to play with.
>
> Life Is Just a Bowl of Cherries and a Beautiful Daughter? :-)

-----------
For some. For others, it's a lot of pain and suicidal ideation and a board that won't be able to help them as much as it used to--not because, as Shar has said, we political folks don't care about those in pain, but because we need support, too. And we're not getting it from you. We're getting a bunch of one-liners and sarcasm disguised as innocent cuteness like above.

I hope you give Sandra Dee the apology she deserves, even if you won't do it on the board, so everyone can see that, maybe, under it all, you're a mensch.

boardy


Share
Tweet  

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Administration | Framed

poster:beardedlady thread:6087
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20020627/msgs/6156.html