Re: Psycho-Babble » IsoM

Posted by christophrejmc on April 2, 2002, at 18:04:24

In reply to Re: Psycho-Babble » christophrejmc, posted by IsoM on April 2, 2002, at 1:39:16

> Regarding the name Dr. Bob chose:
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faq.html#name

"A fanciful name. I mean no disrespect to anyone who participates. I also don't intend to overdo the caveat emptor business -- just because you see something on the Internet doesn't mean it's *not* true, either."
This would be fine if it was "Psychobabble" (talk/writing using inaccurate or irrelevant pseudopsychiatric jargon) -- but not for "Psycho-Babble."

Thread

Re: please be civil « christophrejmc Dr. Bob 3/31/02
down to earth streetwise opines « trouble Dr. Bob 3/31/02
Re: blocked for week » trouble Dr. Bob 3/31/02
Re: blocked for week » Dr. Bob christophrejmc 3/31/02
Re: offensiveness Dr. Bob 3/31/02
Psycho-Babble » Dr. Bob christophrejmc 4/1/02
Re: Psycho-Babble » christophrejmc IsoM 4/2/02
Re: Psycho-Babble » IsoM christophrejmc 4/2/02
i'll use my typical, should hold off response... Krazy Kat 4/2/02
Re: Psycho-Babble Dr. Bob 4/2/02
Re: offensiveness Mitchell 4/3/02
Lou's answer to the offensive language lou pilder 4/3/02
Re: offensiveness Dr. Bob 4/4/02
But Lou, dear Zo 4/4/02
Re: But Lou, dear » Zo Lou Pilder 4/4/02
Who gets to keep the money? ;-) (nm) » Lou Pilder Zo 4/4/02
Re: Who gets to keep the money? ;-) » Zo Lou Pilder 4/5/02
The good of the many ... » Dr. Bob Jonathan 4/5/02

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:christophrejmc thread:3678
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20020308/msgs/3734.html