Psycho-Babble Administration | about the operation of this site | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: another post about the article

Posted by Dr. Bob on July 3, 2001, at 9:17:35

In reply to Ethics admission, posted by Mitchell on July 2, 2001, at 21:33:00

> I am aware that a majority of the active members of this discussion seemed to whole-heartedly support Bob's publication, and that some of the people who objected to his use of this group have since left or have been barred from participating here.

FYI, Some of the "people" I've blocked have been the same person. One of the drawbacks of the current format is, as I mentioned in the article, "the technical difficulty of effectively preventing determined individuals from gaining at least temporary entry into the group". I can block someone, but they can just come back under a different name.

> I feel it worthwhile to repost his comments here. I suspect he was as aware of the limitations of privacy in a Yahoo group as were the Psycho-babble members who he quoted in the research article.

It's OK with me for this to be reposted. I'm not trying to hide anything. But did you check with the owner of the ISMHO list? Those posts aren't public, like these. :-)

Bob


Share
Tweet  

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Administration | Framed

poster:Dr. Bob thread:1532
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20010315/msgs/1533.html