Psycho-Babble Administration | about the operation of this site | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: Re warning on methodone thread

Posted by Elizabeth on May 16, 2001, at 17:52:49

In reply to Re: Re warning on methodone thread, posted by Dr. Bob on May 12, 2001, at 0:42:23

> > the far worse offense was in accusing someone who was presenting a point of view, of being a pusher and analyzing her "avoidance" based on no factual information.
>
> "Pusher" has different connotations that I don't think apply here.

I'm not sure I understand what you mean by this. Could you elaborate? When someone calls someone else a "pusher" in this context, it sounds to me like they're calling that person a drug dealer. *Maybe* it didn't occur to the person who said it that that's how it sounds. *Maybe* the person just meant they thought that someone else was "pushing" a particular treatment on another person. But I think those are really big "maybes."

> But I agree, it would've been better to avoid the "avoidance" comment, but I guess I didn't think it crossed the line.

It sounds like amateur psychoanalysis to me. < g >

Seriously, I think a major issue in psychiatry is the use of putatively "objective" diagnoses to convey subjective feelings of dislike or insults. (Defense mechanisms could be considered a psychoanalytic type of "diagnosis.") A few examples of things that mental health professionals do (and amateurs follow suit):

* saying that a kid has "oppositional defiant disorder" (meaning he's a pain in the *ss)

* or that an adult has a "personality disorder" (connoting that he or she is frustrating and/or that s/he is to be blamed for his/her failure to respond to treatment)

* or that a drug addict has "antisocial personality disorder" (because he had to commit crimes in order to obtain drugs illegally)

* or that a woman has "PMS" (meaning that the speaker thinks that she's a b*tch)

> > Are you showing a bit of a bias here?
>
> Not here, I don't think. But those who contribute more may be treated more leniently, and those who contribute less, more strictly.

In theory I sort of disagree with this, but in practise, new or unknown people are more likely to be troublemakers or trolls. So I guess I can understand the reasoning behind keeping a closer watch and a tighter leash on newcomers, even though the idea bothers me.

-elizabeth


Share
Tweet  

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Administration | Framed

poster:Elizabeth thread:1158
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20010315/msgs/1194.html