Posted by JahL on May 13, 2001, at 17:36:46
In reply to Re: ECT expert suggestion » Dr. Bob, posted by shelliR on May 12, 2001, at 11:08:13
> Dr. Bob, In keeping with the above idea. I didn't find the last guest's answers to be of much interest because he either didn't know some of the more controversial or difficult questions, and because his other answers were brief and contained not much more information than any psychiatrist (or many people on the board) would know.
> I would rather see someone answer questions in more depth in their specialty (e.g., ECT ), even if it means not having everyone's questions answered. Maybe pick five or six questions to answer.
> Anyway, just an idea. I was disappointed the last round. ShelliI'm not yr cyber-stalker Shelli ( promise), but boy do I agree with yr assessment.
Dr. B, I didn't really want to speak out of turn or sound ungrateful but since someone's set the ball rolling (& that poxy Yahoo poll wouldn't work)...
Was very disappointed with Dr. Richelson who appeared so conventional in his outlook it hurt. Answers seemed curt & generally (politely) dismissive of anything deviating from the norm. Hardly appropriate for this treatment-resistant bunch. I noted his longest answer concerned his (Grand Rnds) talk.
That said it is still a great idea & was well executed. Just find some-one who has a genuine interest in hard-core TRD next time :-)
The ECT thang sounds interesting...
J
poster:JahL
thread:1172
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20010315/msgs/1178.html