Psycho-Babble Administration | about the operation of this site | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: Dr. Bob, would you have a reply

Posted by Joy on March 4, 2001, at 8:01:24

In reply to Re: Dr. Bob, would you have a reply » JahL, posted by steve on March 4, 2001, at 0:53:10

Steve,
Lighten up. We don't need censorship here. Don't you know what personal responsibility is? Nobody has to take any advice given here, but it should be able to be given freely no matter how you personally feel about it. There are many different opinions here and everybody has a right to express what they believe. I have found better information here than at my psychs office because these people are taking the meds and giving their reactions and thoughts. I certainly would like that to continue. You don't have to read anything that does not appeal to you. Just go to another topic.
NO CENSORSIP! Just my two cents!
Joy

> Your reply fails to address the points I make.
>
> Freedom of speech is a great thing, it means that anyone can say anthing, no matter how misguided, stupid or vile, as the Ku Klux Klan can attest. It does NOT mean that private citizens are obliged to let people vent such speech on private premises. Nobody has a constitutional right to post on a private bulletin board, I don't know where you come up with such notions.
>
> The second point where I think there is some confusion is in regards to what I complained about. I have no problem with anyone posting treatment guidelines for different illnesses, in fact it is commendable. However to suggest that people go for potentially life threatening treatments without proper oversight is another matter. Surely you wouldn't suggest a do it yourself cardiological work up? Or a non doctor performing heart surgery? Then why do you stand up for someone one who wants a non doctor to perform molecular brain surgery?
>
>
> >
> > Exactly. Driving cars is dangerous (& unlike meds, has no positive impact on yr hlth). This doesn't mean we can't discuss the pleasures of the open road or advertise cars for sale. In yr country Steve it would be unconstitutional to prevent such discussion.
> >
> > This site fosters the exchange of info that most pdocs just aren't aware of & which would otherwise not be in the public domain.
> >
> > Steve, medical books facilitate dx, & offer treatment algorithms which anyone minded to do so could instigate for themselves. Would you advocate curtailing public access to these (thus leading to patient ignorance-a manifestly bad thing)?
> >
> > Thanx 4 bringing the FAQ 2 my attn, Shelli. Dr Bob has covered himself by issuing disclaimers & as such, has no case to answer.
> >
> > J


Share
Tweet  

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Administration | Framed

poster:Joy thread:743
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20001124/msgs/751.html