Re: being civil--is glib always civil?

Posted by NikkiT2 on January 29, 2001, at 8:18:27

In reply to Re: being civil--is glib always civil?, posted by shar on January 29, 2001, at 0:16:57

Oh, so as long as I were to attack people / ideas using nice long "academic" words, that would be OK would it??
name feels the need to attack anything posted that others here may believe in. he causing serious tension and upset on this site - not just to myself. One person, who I feel was a HUGE asset to this site, has already been banned by voicing the opinion of the masses regarding name. How can you actually have considered doing this, as the person banned has helped both you (I'm sure) and many many members of this site with his knowledge. I was flabagasted when I heard you had banned him. Ridiculous is pretty much a good answer.
But if you feel that name, with his so called academic ideas is a greater asset to this, so be it. personally, I think you're making a huge mistake.
Nikki

Thread

Hefty subscription price!! Hefty article price!! Noa 1/20/01
...
Re: The worst of Both Worlds. stjames 1/24/01
Re: The worst of Both Worlds. » Noa name 1/24/01
Re: independent follow-up Dr. Bob 1/25/01
Re: independent follow-up name 1/25/01
Re: independent follow-up » name Cam W. 1/25/01
Re: independent follow-up Rebecca 1/25/01
Re: independent follow-up » Rebecca Noa 1/25/01
Re: independent follow-up ksvt 1/26/01
Re: please be civil Dr. Bob 1/26/01
Re: please be civil » Dr. Bob NikkiT2 1/27/01
Re: being civil Dr. Bob 1/28/01
Re: being civil--is glib always civil? shar 1/29/01
Re: being civil--is glib always civil? NikkiT2 1/29/01
Re: being civil--is glib always civil? Dr. Bob 1/29/01
Re: independent follow-up Noa 1/30/01
Re: limiting interruptions Dr. Bob 1/30/01

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:NikkiT2 thread:266
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20001124/msgs/392.html

	for
in