![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 18 to 42 of 60. Go back in thread:
Posted by alexandra_k on May 11, 2015, at 0:20:42
In reply to Re: not doing so well, posted by alexandra_k on May 10, 2015, at 19:38:26
so the NZD approaches the AUD... And we know how the AUD has been doing - right?
Technically... IN the Australian constitution... NZ is a state of Australia.
NZ is all fierce about it's own independence... On a number of grounds... Typically most-est because of the Treaty of Waitangi. Because Australia basically doesn't give a sh*t about indigenous people insofar as they won't assimilate...
There is this whole thing about 'stolen generations' in Australia. Basically... The white settlers had babies with aboriginal people and some of those babies could pass for white... And so they did drive-bys and took the ones who they thought they could raise in orphanages as white... Thinking it would be giving them a better life...
And now there are entry categories to help the ones who could pass as white to a 'better life'.
NZ basically is a state of Australia... Except that NZ international policy is so liberal that the Aussies had to put severe restrictions on immigration from NZ. So now NZ born citizens get nothing really from Australia, because we have decided to be so liberal about our own immigration. NZ is no longer the gateway to the developed world because the developed world has responded to us by (rightly) seeing us as... Potentially harboring significant threats.
(Hence british detension facilities).
Anyway... Back to chemistry, ho..
Posted by alexandra_k on May 11, 2015, at 0:24:08
In reply to Re: not doing so well, posted by alexandra_k on May 9, 2015, at 17:18:19
anyway... point being...
northern territory is a problem for austraila. requireing 'special solutions' re medical intake. ya gotta be a little bit special to desire / to be effective in working in communities who got severely f*ck*d over by alcohol and / or glue and / or whatever other sh*t that should have rightly exterminated them (but just led to significant brain damage) years ago...
and nz is kinda sorta kinda a problem, too...
so... special categories for us all. yay.
and i'm supposed to function?
and how is my math?
and what does anybody expect?
and i don't f*ck*ng know anymore.
Posted by SLS on May 15, 2015, at 16:16:21
In reply to Re: not doing so well » SLS, posted by alexandra_k on May 8, 2015, at 20:24:14
> good to hear things have been going better for you. hope things get better, still...
After two weeks of feeling better, Saphris turned foul on me. It increased the severity of my depression. Most prominent were dysphoria and suicidal ideation. Just to be sure, I discontinued it for a few days and then rechallenged. Unfortunately, the same thing happened again. I hope high-dose memantine works magic. I feel that this is my last option.
Damn.
- Scott
Posted by alexandra_k on May 16, 2015, at 4:10:17
In reply to Re: not doing so well » alexandra_k, posted by SLS on May 15, 2015, at 16:16:21
ah. sorry to hear that.
it is pretty sucky how things feel like they've really turned a corner, sometimes, and then it feels like you end up taking however many steps back...
i've been a bit up and down... chemistry has turned all incomprehensible. some combo of reactions / reaction schemes that i simply don't follow... seem to go straight in one ear and out the other... and maths that does the same. Just need to keep on keeping on, though... Persistence... Need to remember things got a bit incomprehensible with it last year, too, but I managed to scrape through things okay in the end. I just need to have faith that the same will be the case for this year...
Posted by alexandra_k on May 17, 2015, at 0:38:56
In reply to Re: not doing so well, posted by alexandra_k on May 16, 2015, at 4:10:17
the internet did get wrecked. it became too popular and now it's worthless...
i read this thing about how pharma companies etc have discovered that it is valuable to survey doctors (for example) and ask them who they think the trusted figures are, in their field. then they know to target their advertising or whatever to those trusted figures. if they can get those trusted figures onside (giving talks or whatever) then they can get all those who trust them onside...
the whole thing has been hijacked. google, too. people pay for rankings, or whatever. or those stupid little pop ups or whatever... those links that are 'accidentally' triggered... the whole thing is just... crap. basically.
i wonder if pharma reps etc posted here during the height of the sites popularity? I bet they did... what are you going to do about it? indeed...
on the one hand an argument for complete lack of privacy. and that is basically the way things have gone. no privacy at all... no opting out, either. being forced out is something that can be done as punishment. by governments, or whomever.
i suppose one might be able to control things, still, if one knew how. studied computer science for a while or... whatever...
not entirely sure what i'm saying... the internet... what once was... has gone away. they wrecked it. oh yes they did. the masses... inevitable, i suppose. what always happens... i feel sad.
Posted by alexandra_k on May 17, 2015, at 0:50:19
In reply to Re: not doing so well, posted by alexandra_k on May 17, 2015, at 0:38:56
i have to do this assignment... and it sucks. it isn't an essay apparently (they failed me last time because 'they didn't want a traditional essay' apparently). so... what do they want? people who do as they say, because they say. because they know what's best - right? because they are trying to train us to graduate study and beyond - right? because they have a better eye to the journals than we do and they are training us to be able to write for journals - right? no to all of the above... it just comes back to... because they say...
things don't make sense. they'll chastise us to 'make sure you grasp the distinction between equity and equality' (for example) but then they will go on in their explanation making it oh so clear that they do not grasp the distinction. saying thinks like 'inequalities are unjust' or 'inequalities are fixable'. mmm hmm. inequities were defined before as UNFAIR inequalities but 1+1 does not equal 3 or 4 or 5 or 6 or 7... None of that is unust. None of that is easily fixable. But 'easily fixable' and 'unjust' I'm supposed to remember for the multi-guess quiz... Unless it doesn't suit you in which case that is the wrong answer. I throw your teaching up the stairs... It doesn't make any sense.
And yet some people do well in the assessment, apparently. The same people who do well in other assessments that are similar? I don't know... Perhaps. Perhaps there is some magic with respect to past questions.... Or perhaps there is some calibration with respect to what the people say and last secondary school attended... I don't know... I just know... Lalalalalalallalalalalalla I can't hear you and I don't want to... Not when you are talking such crap. Honestly...
And my inability to suck it up could be problematic.
We will see, I suppose.
It is back to the tech mentality... Instead of people accepting that the role of their class is a load lightener... Instead of thinking that the aim is to delight and entertain and educate and inspire... Instead of all of that... They think the aim is for them to 'teach people a lesson' or whatever. So... They don't even notice the people who are so very good at nodding and smiling (who would happily exterminate them if they got the chance - full frontal smiles)... Those people are prized over the people who are like 'how can you read that with a straight face? You can see that the author of that article is taking the piss - right?' Only... They can't...
I am so sick of this... I think this is a large part of why people were surprised about the starting over thing. I guess I'd forgotten how... How many fairly crap people are stuck there in early ranks. Making it up means not having those people standing over you any more. These people think they know better than me how to read an academic article and how to write an academic essay (or think that whatever it is that they have set us is more valuable/ worthwhile than an academic essay such that anything that approximates an academic essay, that might actually eb a contrtribution to the field must be swiftly stomped on / failed. Because... That is what we do in academia. Clearly. When you have a non-academic bogus field.
Sigh.
Blech.
Posted by Lou Pilder on May 18, 2015, at 9:00:48
In reply to Re: not doing so well » alexandra_k, posted by SLS on May 15, 2015, at 16:16:21
> > good to hear things have been going better for you. hope things get better, still...
>
> After two weeks of feeling better, Saphris turned foul on me. It increased the severity of my depression. Most prominent were dysphoria and suicidal ideation. Just to be sure, I discontinued it for a few days and then rechallenged. Unfortunately, the same thing happened again. I hope high-dose memantine works magic. I feel that this is my last option.
>
> Damn.
>
>
> - ScottScott,
You wrote,[...,Saphris turned foul on me...Most prominent were dysphoria and suicidal ideation (increased the severity of depression)...I feel that this is my last option (taking memantine)...].
I am unsure as to what you are wanting to mean here. If you could post answers to the following, then I could respond accordingly.
True or False:
A. If memantine does not take me out of my depression, Lou, then I will kill myself.
B. If memantine does not work for me, Lou, then I will re read all of your posts here and convert to the foundation of Judaism as revealed to you, Lou.
C. I realize now, Lou, that I have been advocating drugs here that could lead to death
D. I realize now, Lou, that psychiatry has led me to the end of a road that leads to death.
E. I realize now, Lou, that the chemical imbalance theory of psychiatry is false and misleading and could lead readers here to their deaths.
F. I realize now, Lou, that you have been correct all along and that you could save lives, prevent life-ruining conditions and addictions if there were not the prohibitions posted here to you from Mr. Hsiung.
G. I realize now, Lou, that posting what could lead readers to think of you in hostile and disagreeable ways and decrease the respect, regard and confidence in which you are held, and be allowed here to be seen as civil and supportive, could result in the deaths of others and cause Jews in other communities to become victims of anti-Semitic violence.
H. redacted by respondent
Lou
Posted by SLS on May 18, 2015, at 10:32:28
In reply to Lou's request- » SLS, posted by Lou Pilder on May 18, 2015, at 9:00:48
It is no secret that responses to psychotropic and other types of drugs are unpredictable and can produce negative effects on mental function. It is good practice for a psychiatrist to see a patient once a week in the beginning of treatment to screen for adverse effects, suicidal ideation being one of them.
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20000526/msgs/35096.html
For me, the potential gain is worth the risk. I thank God for psychiatric drug treatments. According to what I have read, the statistical rate of suicides during antidepressant treatment is much, much lower than that attributable to negative iatrogenic reactions.
Prednisone, clonidine, alpha interferons, varenicline, and progesterone are just some of the well known non-psychiatric drugs to produce negative effects on mood and cognition.
- Scott
Posted by Lou Pilder on May 18, 2015, at 11:03:15
In reply to Drugs can worsen depression., posted by SLS on May 18, 2015, at 10:32:28
> It is no secret that responses to psychotropic and other types of drugs are unpredictable and can produce negative effects on mental function. It is good practice for a psychiatrist to see a patient once a week in the beginning of treatment to screen for adverse effects, suicidal ideation being one of them.
>
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20000526/msgs/35096.html
>
> For me, the potential gain is worth the risk. I thank God for psychiatric drug treatments. According to what I have read, the statistical rate of suicides during antidepressant treatment is much, much lower than that attributable to negative iatrogenic reactions.
>
> Prednisone, clonidine, alpha interferons, varenicline, and progesterone are just some of the well known non-psychiatric drugs to produce negative effects on mood and cognition.
>
>
> - ScottScott,
You wrote,[...I thank God for psychiatric treatment...]
I am unsure as to what you want readers to think by that. If you could post answers to the following, then I could respond accordingly.
A. Which God are you thanking for psychiatric treatments?
Lou
Posted by Lou Pilder on May 18, 2015, at 11:28:53
In reply to Lou's request- » SLS, posted by Lou Pilder on May 18, 2015, at 11:03:15
> > It is no secret that responses to psychotropic and other types of drugs are unpredictable and can produce negative effects on mental function. It is good practice for a psychiatrist to see a patient once a week in the beginning of treatment to screen for adverse effects, suicidal ideation being one of them.
> >
> > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20000526/msgs/35096.html
> >
> > For me, the potential gain is worth the risk. I thank God for psychiatric drug treatments. According to what I have read, the statistical rate of suicides during antidepressant treatment is much, much lower than that attributable to negative iatrogenic reactions.
> >
> > Prednisone, clonidine, alpha interferons, varenicline, and progesterone are just some of the well known non-psychiatric drugs to produce negative effects on mood and cognition.
> >
> >
> > - Scott
>
> Scott,
> You wrote,[...I thank God for psychiatric treatment...]
> I am unsure as to what you want readers to think by that. If you could post answers to the following, then I could respond accordingly.
> A. Which God are you thanking for psychiatric treatments?
> Lou
>
correction;
Scott wrote,[...I thank God for psychiatric {drug} treatments...]
This is different from just psychiatric treatments.
Lou
Posted by Lamdage22 on May 20, 2015, at 11:51:16
In reply to correction- Scott thanking God for drug treatments, posted by Lou Pilder on May 18, 2015, at 11:28:53
You thank god for psychiatric medication yet you are still desperate enough to have holes and electrodes drilled into your skull? DBS?
With all due respect, that doesnt make any sense.
Posted by SLS on May 21, 2015, at 0:26:44
In reply to Re: correction- Scott thanking God for drug treatments, posted by Lamdage22 on May 20, 2015, at 11:51:16
> You thank god for psychiatric medication yet you are still desperate enough to have holes and electrodes drilled into your skull? DBS?
>
> With all due respect, that doesnt make any sense.Drugs help me enough so as to allow me to shop for food and pay bills. They allow me to live independently. I do not take this good fortune for granted. Included in my praise of God and psychotropics is their success in bring many other people into remission and the ability to achieve mental health and work towards happiness. However, it might be time for me to more vigorously pursue brain stumulation techniques, which include magnetic and direct current treatments. My brain is adept at reacting to positive drug responses with tachyphylaxis. Perhaps the combination of pharmacological and tissue stimulation would work for me.
I know that you have had your disappointments with psychotropic drug treatments. Since I don't know the details of your symptomatology and treatment history, it is difficult to offer suggestions that might renew your hopes for treatment success. For every new drug that becomes available, a certain percentage of previously treatment-resistent people will go on to respond well to it. I'm waiting for cariprazine to become available. It works like Abilify, but is stronger at D3 receptors in the limbic system. I am hoping that this translates into a more robust antidpessant effect.
- Scott
Posted by Lamdage22 on May 21, 2015, at 4:30:27
In reply to Re: correction- Scott thanking God for drug treatments » Lamdage22, posted by SLS on May 21, 2015, at 0:26:44
I may try Rapastinel some time.
Im not sure though yet. I take 37.5mg Venlafaxin and it helps a little.
Im just very disillusioned.
Who knows what has been swept under the rug by naurex???
Posted by Lou Pilder on May 21, 2015, at 7:57:52
In reply to Re: correction- Scott thanking God for drug treatments » Lamdage22, posted by SLS on May 21, 2015, at 0:26:44
> > You thank god for psychiatric medication yet you are still desperate enough to have holes and electrodes drilled into your skull? DBS?
> >
> > With all due respect, that doesnt make any sense.
>
> Drugs help me enough so as to allow me to shop for food and pay bills. They allow me to live independently. I do not take this good fortune for granted. Included in my praise of God and psychotropics is their success in bring many other people into remission and the ability to achieve mental health and work towards happiness. However, it might be time for me to more vigorously pursue brain stumulation techniques, which include magnetic and direct current treatments. My brain is adept at reacting to positive drug responses with tachyphylaxis. Perhaps the combination of pharmacological and tissue stimulation would work for me.
>
> I know that you have had your disappointments with psychotropic drug treatments. Since I don't know the details of your symptomatology and treatment history, it is difficult to offer suggestions that might renew your hopes for treatment success. For every new drug that becomes available, a certain percentage of previously treatment-resistent people will go on to respond well to it. I'm waiting for cariprazine to become available. It works like Abilify, but is stronger at D3 receptors in the limbic system. I am hoping that this translates into a more robust antidpessant effect.
>
>
> - ScottFriends,
It is written above that psychotropic drugs helps the poster to shop for food and pay bills and to live independently and that others that take these drugs can be remitted from what they take the drugs for, assuming that they take the drugs for the hope of having depression and such remitted which according to the poster those people could achieve mental health and work toward happiness.. That could lead you to be deceived into thinking that you could take these drugs and not be harmed by them or that as a parent your child could not be harmed from taking these drugs. This is all because as to the drugs helping to shop for food and pay bills, it is not specified as to how taking these drugs allows the poster to pay bills or shop for food as to what that could mean. If you are led to believe that the drugs help the poster to work to make money to pay bills, that could be seriously misleading because the drugs can debilitate a person and addict the person so that in withdrawal, or in the state of akathisia one could not go to do their job to earn money to pay bills or even go to a store to buy food. In fact, the drugs could disable a person so that they could have to stop working and could not earn a living to support themselves and be dependent on others or charity or government assistance. The drugs could induce a life-ruining condition so that the taker could never work again or worse, induce suicidal thinking or homicidal thinking to kill themselves and/or others.
Let us know the whole truth. Let it be exposed that there could be a placebo effect when one takes these drugs that does not last. And there could be an initial effect that could cause the body to have an imbalance of chemicals that causes the body to react to the drug to worsen the person's depression and such and then addiction could set in which could lead to suicide in particular but not limited to young people. And there could be death by heart attack and liver disease and blood disease and kidney failure and stroke and a host of other life-ruining conditions including a life-time of suffering from tardive dyskinesia.
My friends, be not deceived. There are thousands of people each year that are killed by these drugs. What good could it do for you to swallow the propaganda from the drug companies that you see on television pandering drugs and by taking them you could end up dead or so debilitated as to that you think that you need a drug to go to the store to buy food. Is that happiness that you think comes from God?
Lou
Posted by Lou Pilder on May 21, 2015, at 9:18:14
In reply to Re: correction- Scott thanking God for drug treatments » Lamdage22, posted by SLS on May 21, 2015, at 0:26:44
> > You thank god for psychiatric medication yet you are still desperate enough to have holes and electrodes drilled into your skull? DBS?
> >
> > With all due respect, that doesnt make any sense.
>
> Drugs help me enough so as to allow me to shop for food and pay bills. They allow me to live independently. I do not take this good fortune for granted. Included in my praise of God and psychotropics is their success in bring many other people into remission and the ability to achieve mental health and work towards happiness. However, it might be time for me to more vigorously pursue brain stumulation techniques, which include magnetic and direct current treatments. My brain is adept at reacting to positive drug responses with tachyphylaxis. Perhaps the combination of pharmacological and tissue stimulation would work for me.
>
> I know that you have had your disappointments with psychotropic drug treatments. Since I don't know the details of your symptomatology and treatment history, it is difficult to offer suggestions that might renew your hopes for treatment success. For every new drug that becomes available, a certain percentage of previously treatment-resistent people will go on to respond well to it. I'm waiting for cariprazine to become available. It works like Abilify, but is stronger at D3 receptors in the limbic system. I am hoping that this translates into a more robust antidpessant effect.
>
>
> - ScottFriends,
The poster writes that he praises a God for psychotropic drugs. Yet today, the God in question is not specified.
This could seriously mislead you to think that the God that the poster is praising is the God that The Jews, Christians and Islamic people give service and worship to. You see, the character of that God is revealed in the scriptures that the Jews and Christians and Islamic people use. And I am prevented by the prohibitions to me here from Mr. Hsiung to post my own repudiation here if the poster ever identifies the God that he is using in reference to being thanked by him for psychotropic drugs. Since he is allowed to evade my request to identify which God he is referring to, I do not have the opportunity to post what has been revealed to me until I know which God he is using to give thanks to for psychotropic drugs.
Now be it as it may be, the God could be the God that the Jews worship. And since I am prohibited by Mr. Hsiung to post my own repudiation to the statement if the God in question is that God, then the policy here is against the Jew, which makes the policy an anti-Semitic policy that could lead readers to think that this is an anti-Semitic community by the nature that the leader's policy is to prohibit a Jew from having equal protection of the rules because the poster is not required to identify the God that he is using to thank for mind-altering drugs prescribed by a psychiatrist so that readers could think that the poster is using the God that the Jews worship as his subject God.
By the poster being allowed to evade my request for identification here, Jews and Christians and Islamic people could feel insulted an humiliated to see that the God in question could be that God since it is not specified otherwise, for there could be a subset of Jews and others that have been revealed as to the character of the God that they worship to be different from the God that the poster alludes to without identifying and the statement is allowed here to be seen as supportive which could lead a Jew to feel put down.
Since the policy here is that I am prohibited by Mr. Hsiung from posting from a Jewish perspective as revealed to me, and the God in question could be the God that the Jews worship, the policy here is against the Jew which makes the policy an ant-Semitic policy and by extension the community could be deemed by a subset of readers to be an anti-Semitic community because of that.
If Scott ever identifies which God he is using here in his posts, then readers could know as to if he is using the God that the Jews worship or not. That IMHHHO could be supportive, and being supportive takes precedence here. In my thinking, being evasive is not being supportive, yet it is allowed here. If it was not allowed, then I think that lives could be saved, life-ruining conditions and addictions could be prevented. That is supportive in any community unless the community believes that death is supportive.
Lou
Posted by Horse on May 23, 2015, at 1:22:54
In reply to Re: not doing so well, posted by alexandra_k on April 25, 2015, at 19:20:46
Don't ever move here (US). I'd move to NZ in a heartbeat. Anyways, I'm unhappy to hear your county is being sold off. And that your prison is privatized. That's the trend here, and it frightens and saddens me.
Posted by alexandra_k on May 24, 2015, at 2:43:03
In reply to Re: not doing so well » alexandra_k, posted by Horse on May 23, 2015, at 1:22:54
hey.
i suspect it isn't foreign investors so much as local investors who have set themselves up an off shore company for whatever legal reasons.
the prison... / detention facility... they are calling it a 'rehabilitation facility' but i didn't think the UK was doing so well with rehabilitating their own prisoners... there was something on the news the other night about media not being able to go inside prisons and interview inmates... anyway... who knows what will go on inside a foreign staffed 'rehabilitation facility'.
i suspect that sometimes the thing about 'free trade' is 'give it to us freely - or you will force us to come and take it against your will'.
i think there is probably diversity within any country... some people have managed to carve out nice lives for themselves while others struggle...
heard a speel from the GP people the other day... hiking, skiing... adventure sports. pubs... pool... can be a nice life. a nice lifestyle block. would be nice to fly a small plane. these things are viable, i guess. some horses. little bit of an organic farm... if you want...
if you want...
i'm grumpy because i'm stuck in the city with the kids / streetkids. over the city i am.
Posted by Lamdage22 on May 26, 2015, at 13:37:30
In reply to Re: not doing so well » alexandra_k, posted by Horse on May 23, 2015, at 1:22:54
> Don't ever move here (US).
You can move there healthy and with a job offer including medical insurance, but having a mental affliction in the US is no fun at all.
Neither is being poor.
Posted by Horse on May 26, 2015, at 20:10:35
In reply to Re: not doing so well, posted by Lamdage22 on May 26, 2015, at 13:37:30
I'm curious why you think having mental illness is worse in US than DE. I mean, I think I agree that the U.S. healthcare ststem fails the average citizen....
Posted by fayeroe on May 27, 2015, at 4:13:46
In reply to Lou's warning-wholetruth » SLS, posted by Lou Pilder on May 21, 2015, at 7:57:52
Still practicing medicine, Lou?
Posted by Lou Pilder on May 27, 2015, at 6:38:45
In reply to Re: Lou's warning-the whole truth » Lou Pilder, posted by fayeroe on May 27, 2015, at 4:13:46
> Still practicing medicine, Lou?
F,
What you wrote about me here could induce hostile and disagreeable feelings and opinions about me and decrease the respect , regard and confidence in which I am held. For to post anything that could lead readers to think that I am being charged by you of practicing medicine, is a false charge against me and I do not want to be blamed or stigmatized as a result of what you have posted about me with impunity here. And worse, since I am trying to save lives here and prevent life-ruining conditions and addictions, a subset of readers could be led to their deaths IMHO by having the respect ,regard and confidence in which I am held decreased by what you have posted about me here in that they could disregard the warning that I have given here that your post about me is linked to. This warning could save lives IMHHHHO, for what is contained in the warning are facts, facts that could mark the difference IMHO between one being a live person or a corpse.
You see, I am abiding by the prohibitions here directed to me by Mr. Hsiung. Prohibitions that IMHO stop me from saving lives and stop me from preventing life-ruining conditions and addictions, stop me from showing the historical relationship between psychiatry and mass-murder, stop me from presenting the Jewish perspective as revealed to me which is against the Jew, against Judaism, which fits the definition of what anti-Semitism entails.
You can post here about me with impunity, but the blood of those that have been killed by the drugs here or induced the person to kill themselves, will not be upon me.
Lou
Posted by Toph on May 27, 2015, at 9:40:51
In reply to Re: Lou's warning-the whole truth » Lou Pilder, posted by fayeroe on May 27, 2015, at 4:13:46
It has been written that the poster is a woman who likes to ride beasts wearing pointed leather footwear. She associates with outlaw artists who promote natural herbs. She has been known to imbibe of distilled spirits that can lead to addiction and suicide. She exudes country cool as it has been revealed to her.
Posted by Phil on May 27, 2015, at 9:59:48
In reply to Re: Lou's warning-the whole truth » fayeroe, posted by Toph on May 27, 2015, at 9:40:51
And she's very cool.
Posted by fayeroe on May 27, 2015, at 14:32:10
In reply to Lou's reply-thairblud » fayeroe, posted by Lou Pilder on May 27, 2015, at 6:38:45
Posted by Lamdage22 on May 27, 2015, at 14:36:04
In reply to Re: not doing so well, posted by Horse on May 26, 2015, at 20:10:35
> I'm curious why you think having mental illness is worse in US than DE. I mean, I think I agree that the U.S. healthcare ststem fails the average citizen....
Well. We have institutions here for rehabilitation (from mental illness) that "americans dream of". Thats actually what american psychiatrists said when they visited.
And its all paid for.
You get money monthly. You can go to rehabilitation. You can get assistance for living all at the expense of the state or the health insurance.
If you dont have money, you dont have to pay.
I dont think that america will give you this much support.
Go forward in thread:
Psycho-Babble Social | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.