Psycho-Babble Administration Thread 756918

Shown: posts 94 to 118 of 118. Go back in thread:

 

Re: Ok to be uncivil to Dr. Bob? » gardenergirl

Posted by madeline on May 10, 2007, at 17:16:33

In reply to Re: Ok to be uncivil to Dr. Bob? » greywolf, posted by gardenergirl on May 10, 2007, at 17:03:35

Yeah, there have been lots of times that a lot of us would've wanted to take a louder, more abrasive approach to unfair things here on babble.

But we don't, because we would be blocked or pbc'd. So we continue to try to abide by the rules.

It would be nice to feel that freedom feeling too.

 

Hoots and figs and rats' behinds » Dinah

Posted by gardenergirl on May 10, 2007, at 17:39:46

In reply to Re: Ok to be uncivil to Dr. Bob? » zenhussy, posted by Dinah on May 10, 2007, at 11:03:37

> It simply has to do with personal freedom, not disregard of rules.

That's a good way to put it, Dinah. Thanks for clarifying this. It's how I feel, too. My not giving a hoot about any potential consequences of my post, and by that I mean administrative action, is about my own personal reaction, not about the board or policies in general. I'm enjoying feeling increased freedom to choose my actions and accept the consequences without the burden of interpreting said consequences in ways that injure or otherwise adversely affect my sense of self. I guess you could say I'm enjoying having a stronger ego, one less sensitive to external input and more resilient.

So it's not that I would discount or invalidate any consequences should they present, but rather it's that I don't attach the meaning to them (in theory) that I used to.

Boy, this is a hard state to describe. No wonder my T isn't quite getting it either.

gg

 

Re: perhaps, more importantly - » one woman cine

Posted by gardenergirl on May 10, 2007, at 17:49:28

In reply to Re: perhaps, more importantly -, posted by one woman cine on May 10, 2007, at 11:13:19

>
> Why was she prevented from articulating this previously? (rhetorical question - don't answer, please)

I know you said this was rhetorical, and I know you're talking about more than just my post. I just wanted to toss in here that feeling as if it would be "bad to tell" is at least as much my own stuff as it is the culture. I was brought up to be a "good girl", and those childhood messages have become part of the mixed nuts of me. :)

gg

 

Re: Ok to be uncivil to Dr. Bob? » madeline

Posted by gardenergirl on May 10, 2007, at 17:55:34

In reply to Re: Ok to be uncivil to Dr. Bob? » gardenergirl, posted by madeline on May 10, 2007, at 17:16:33

> Yeah, there have been lots of times that a lot of us would've wanted to take a louder, more abrasive approach to unfair things here on babble.
>
> But we don't, because we would be blocked or pbc'd. So we continue to try to abide by the rules.

So you choose not to because the potential consequence of doing so, i.e. a block or PBC, seems more aversive than any benefit gained from making the post?
>
> It would be nice to feel that freedom feeling too.

As long as someone accepts that they could be blocked or PBC'd, they are certainly free to post freely. So in that respect, we're all free.

But I suspect that's not what you meant.

gg

 

Re: Ok to be uncivil to Dr. Bob? » gardenergirl

Posted by madeline on May 10, 2007, at 21:29:20

In reply to Re: Ok to be uncivil to Dr. Bob? » madeline, posted by gardenergirl on May 10, 2007, at 17:55:34

Well, I guess we all could just post anything and accept the consequences.

Although I'm not sure how supportive or educational that would be.

Is this one of those "when in rome" type situations?

 

Re: Ok to be uncivil to Dr. Bob? » madeline

Posted by gardenergirl on May 10, 2007, at 23:10:41

In reply to Re: Ok to be uncivil to Dr. Bob? » gardenergirl, posted by madeline on May 10, 2007, at 21:29:20

> Well, I guess we all could just post anything and accept the consequences.

Yes.

>
> Although I'm not sure how supportive or educational that would be.

I would think not very much of either.

>
> Is this one of those "when in rome" type situations?

I'm not sure what you mean.

gg

 

Re: perhaps, more importantly -

Posted by one woman cine on May 11, 2007, at 7:41:17

In reply to Re: perhaps, more importantly - » one woman cine, posted by gardenergirl on May 10, 2007, at 17:49:28

> >
> > Why was she prevented from articulating this previously? (rhetorical question - don't answer, please)
>
> I know you said this was rhetorical, and I know you're talking about more than just my post. I just wanted to toss in here that feeling as if it would be "bad to tell" is at least as much my own stuff as it is the culture. I was brought up to be a "good girl", and those childhood messages have become part of the mixed nuts of me. :)
>
> gg
>


Ah yes, of course. I guess that's the point. Maybe it's self-selection too. I think the whole idea about culture is that they are shared beliefs systems - otherwise - one would not take part in a community - one would just leave/not participate.

 

Re:Not responding » notfred

Posted by AuntieMel on May 11, 2007, at 11:09:52

In reply to Re: Surveys, and names, and I statements, Oh my!, posted by notfred on May 10, 2007, at 11:30:05

"noticed the "notify the admins" function gets is not always delt with in a timely manner"

I'm glad you brought this up.

There have been many times (not saying that this applies to anything you may or may not have reported) when we decide that there is no technical violation of the rules.

But the only way we have to contact people is by either posting on the board or by babblemail.

Posting is not a good option. How would you like it if someone, out of the blue, said "notfred's post is civil" Wouldn't that make you think someone reported you - and wouldn't you start wondering who?

And - some people don't have babblemail turned on.

So - they go unanswered.

BUT - sometimes they should be acted on and get overlooked due to load. And in that case it would be good if we got a reminder.

Access to email addresses is just one of those "tools" only Dr. Bob has exclusive access to.

 

Re: Oops - notfred

Posted by AuntieMel on May 11, 2007, at 11:11:28

In reply to Small explanation of one thing » notfred, posted by Racer on May 10, 2007, at 12:05:27

Sorry - I didn't see Racer already answered this.

I'll crawl back in my hole now.....

 

Re: Oops - notfred » AuntieMel

Posted by scratchpad on May 11, 2007, at 14:59:08

In reply to Re: Oops - notfred, posted by AuntieMel on May 11, 2007, at 11:11:28

> Sorry - I didn't see Racer already answered this.
>
> I'll crawl back in my hole now.....

Oh, no you don't!! Here's a pair of sunglasses for the glare. Please set and stay a while. (My favourite line from the Beverly Hillbillies, if somewhat mangled.)

Scratchpad

 

Re: Deputy action on this thread » Racer

Posted by Fallen4MyT on May 11, 2007, at 23:38:08

In reply to Deputy action on this thread, posted by Racer on May 9, 2007, at 18:29:34

> Since I've seen it come up in a couple of posts, I'll share with you *why* I have opted *not* to offer any official correction to this thread. It's pretty simple:
>
> Dr Bob has made it pretty clear, at least to deputies, that he has somewhat more lenient standards of civility when it comes to criticism directed at him. That being the case, and this one falling short of what I would consider blatant incivility, I chose to leave this for Dr Bob to address himself.
>
> I speak only for myself, not for any fellow deputies. I'm not sure whether this is a communication from Racer the Deputy, or Racer the Poster, so I won't try to figure that part out.
>
> I would like to mention, though, that if I see anything blatantly uncivil, in this thread or any other directed towards Dr Bob, I will take action. This isn't open season here, so no big guns. You can take photographs, though, which is how I see this one...

Racer could you please explain this so that I may understand what you mean by " > I would like to mention, though, that if I see anything blatantly uncivil, in this thread or any other directed towards Dr Bob, I will take action."
What WOULD be blantantly uncivil ?

 

Re: Deputy action on this thread » henrietta

Posted by Fallen4MyT on May 11, 2007, at 23:41:19

In reply to Re: Deputy action on this thread » Racer, posted by henrietta on May 9, 2007, at 20:31:23

I cannot address your post above but will say if you have concerns about this I believe you are suppose to EMAIL your concerns about deputies. I always lose that thread but thats my understanding

 

Re: More Sniping/ VERNE I will miss you :*(

Posted by Fallen4MyT on May 11, 2007, at 23:43:53

In reply to More Sniping, posted by verne on May 10, 2007, at 11:48:01

Sorry you are leaving. In case you did not know Dr Bob has asked that when we have issues with a deputy that we EMAIL him. I am sorry you will be gone I hope you change your mind

> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070423/msgs/757229.html
>
> Gardengirl writes in reponse to Henrietta's thoughtful post,
>
> "Was that actually easier to type than whatsername's actual name, whoever whatsername might be? Please, don't put yourself out dear. Use whatever epithets (as in Merriam-Webster's definition 1a) you find easiest."
>
> Henrietta is blocked, yet Gardengirl's sniping is given a free pass?
>
> Gardengirl is one of the most defensive, retaliatory, and vindictive posters I've ever encountered. She knows how to get in her little digs and still be *civil*. She epitomizes what's wrong with this site.
>
> I'm leaving this site for good. By the way, Henrietta, your post was right on the mark.
>
> Verne

 

Re: More Sniping/ VERNE I will miss you :*( » Fallen4MyT

Posted by fayeroe on May 12, 2007, at 9:48:07

In reply to Re: More Sniping/ VERNE I will miss you :*(, posted by Fallen4MyT on May 11, 2007, at 23:43:53

the chickens have finally come home to roost. and Verne nailed it.

even though i know they volunteered, i think they've been treated badly (but i don;t think any of them never knew how he was treating them) and i also say that they got by with sniping and snarky **** and another okie/texas saying is "til the cows come home". the cows are home and so are the chickens.

if it appears that i'm all over the map with this. i am. my SIL just woke me up to argue with me about a bull that we owned before he was born.......

so, i never think clearly when i'm fully awake but i just had to say this.

the prisons in Texas aren't run by the prisoners, neither should support sites be........

 

Blocked for a week » fayeroe

Posted by Dinah on May 12, 2007, at 10:01:59

In reply to Re: More Sniping/ VERNE I will miss you :*( » Fallen4MyT, posted by fayeroe on May 12, 2007, at 9:48:07

> even though i know they volunteered, i think they've been treated badly (but i don;t think any of them never knew how he was treating them) and i also say that they got by with sniping and snarky ****

You've been asked before to be civil, so I'm going to block you from posting for a week.

Dr. Bob is always free to override deputy decisions. His email is on the bottom of each page. Please feel free to email him if you believe this decision was made in error.

Dinah, acting as deputy to Dr. Bob

 

Please follow site guidelines » Fallen4MyT

Posted by Dinah on May 12, 2007, at 10:09:07

In reply to Re: More Sniping/ VERNE I will miss you :*(, posted by Fallen4MyT on May 11, 2007, at 23:43:53

From the FAQ

http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faq.html#civil

Please note last line about quoting others.

> Please don't be sarcastic, treat injury or death lightly, suggest that others harm (or use this site to exchange information that could be used to harm) themselves or others, jump to conclusions about others, post anything that could lead others to feel accused or put down, harass or pressure others, use language that could offend others, disclose without permission information that identifies or private communications from another poster, post information that you know to be false, exaggerate or overgeneralize -- etc. *Even if you're quoting someone else.* (emphasis mine)

If you or others have questions about this or about posting policies in general, or are interested in alternative ways of expressing yourself, please see the FAQ:

http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faq.html#civil

Follow-ups regarding these issues, as well as replies to the above posts, should of course themselves be civil.

Dr. Bob is always free to override deputy decisions. His email is on the bottom of each page. Please feel free to email him if you believe this decision was made in error.

Dinah, acting as deputy to Dr. Bob.

 

Re: deleting posts without notification }} bob

Posted by sdb on May 12, 2007, at 17:46:21

In reply to Please follow site guidelines » Fallen4MyT, posted by Dinah on May 12, 2007, at 10:09:07

In this thread I posted twice. One post disappeared.
Bob, if you deleted that without notification I consider your action as very questionable and this does not comply with any "ethical" rules. It is alarming if somebody claims rules of civility for people but there are none of them who claims. Furthermore there was no uncivil content in that post. I would like to hear at least a why. If there is no explanation I will terminate my membership here.

warm regards

sdb

 

Re: deleting posts without notification }} bob » sdb

Posted by Dinah on May 12, 2007, at 17:50:33

In reply to Re: deleting posts without notification }} bob, posted by sdb on May 12, 2007, at 17:46:21

I believe Dr. Bob deleted some posts made by someone posting while blocked. When he does that, he usually deletes replies to the blocked poster as well, because leaving them up would lead to confusion.

I've lost some excellent posts that way myself, and it is a bit annoying. But I understand the reasoning behind Dr. Bob's decision.

Dinah

 

deleting posts without notification }} dinah, bob

Posted by sdb on May 12, 2007, at 18:04:17

In reply to Re: deleting posts without notification }} bob » sdb, posted by Dinah on May 12, 2007, at 17:50:33

> I believe Dr. Bob deleted some posts made by someone posting while blocked. When he does that, he usually deletes replies to the blocked poster as well, because leaving them up would lead to confusion.
>
> I've lost some excellent posts that way myself, and it is a bit annoying. But I understand the reasoning behind Dr. Bob's decision.
>
> Dinah

Thanks for your input, Dinah. If it is so, there should be a notification that this can happen.

sdb

 

Re: Please follow site guidelines./OOPS SORRY

Posted by Fallen4MyT on May 12, 2007, at 18:09:53

In reply to Please follow site guidelines » Fallen4MyT, posted by Dinah on May 12, 2007, at 10:09:07

Oops sorry I didn't even know I hit the quote area

I will report my note to Verne.

Sorry you are leaving. In case you did not know Dr Bob has asked that when we have issues with a deputy that we EMAIL him. I am sorry you will be gone I hope you change your mind

 

Re: Please follow site guidelines./OOPS SORRY

Posted by Phillipa on May 12, 2007, at 19:25:45

In reply to Re: Please follow site guidelines./OOPS SORRY, posted by Fallen4MyT on May 12, 2007, at 18:09:53

Leaving one by one is that the plan then no more babble? Just a question. Nothing uncivil. Love Phillipa

 

Re: deleting posts

Posted by Dr. Bob on June 29, 2007, at 2:12:49

In reply to deleting posts without notification }} dinah, bob, posted by sdb on May 12, 2007, at 18:04:17

> > I believe Dr. Bob deleted some posts made by someone posting while blocked.

Yes, that's what happened.

> > When he does that, he usually deletes replies to the blocked poster as well, because leaving them up would lead to confusion.
>
> If it is so, there should be a notification that this can happen.

That's a good point, I've updated the FAQ:

http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faq.html#enforce

Bob

 

Re: deleting posts » Dr. Bob

Posted by muffled on June 29, 2007, at 9:40:47

In reply to Re: deleting posts, posted by Dr. Bob on June 29, 2007, at 2:12:49

This is from that link you supplied:

>If you're upset by something someone posts, you're welcome to respond to them yourself, but if you do, please be civil. If you want to make sure I know about a post, please either post yourself to Psycho-Babble Administration or email me directly (and include "Psycho-Babble" in the subject line).

*My understanding is that one is no longer to post to admin, but to use the notify admin button.
The last part of this paragraph should be updated as well.

For eg:?
If you want to make sure I know about a post, please use the notify administrators button below the post, this post will then be sent to myself and the deputies for review. I can be reached directly by e-mail as well.(and include "Psycho-Babble" in the subject line).

 

Re: updating the faq

Posted by Dr. Bob on June 29, 2007, at 23:57:07

In reply to Re: deleting posts » Dr. Bob, posted by muffled on June 29, 2007, at 9:40:47

> My understanding is that one is no longer to post to admin, but to use the notify admin button.
> The last part of this paragraph should be updated as well.

Thanks, that's also a good point, I've updated it again.

Bob

 

thx for clarification and updating FAQ }} all (nm)

Posted by sdb on June 30, 2007, at 21:24:10

In reply to Re: updating the faq, posted by Dr. Bob on June 29, 2007, at 23:57:07


This is the end of the thread.


Show another thread

URL of post in thread:


Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ


[dr. bob] Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD, bob@dr-bob.org

Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.