![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 1 to 4 of 4. This is the beginning of the thread.
Posted by alexandra_k on April 17, 2022, at 0:14:25
all the little students complain directly to the new zealand vice chancellor's committee.
after they have exhausted the internal complaints resolution of their own universities (designed to have them waste close to a year of time. you know how it is. you complain to x. they have up to 3 weeks -- but they run over-time. you complain to x+1 position on the hierarchy. they have up to 3 weeks -- but they run over-time. you complain to x+2 position on the hierarchy. they have up to 3 weeks -- but they run over-time.
the higher up says 'nah nah nah nah nah we can't hear you. unless and until you get a response from the appropriately positioned person or people nah nah nah nah nah'.
and once the complaints have been received by the chief executive of the new zealand vice chancellors committee...
he just squashes them. puts them in a drawer or something. burns them. and that's an end to them.
which is for the good, obviously. because the only alternative would be for him to arranage for you tobe unlawfully detained and tortured, for having complained, i suppose.
the courts of new zealand have established a precedent whereby they will acknowledge that the chief exective did not do what he was required to do. they will say that it doesn't matter because being chief exective means you get to write the policy. so you don't actually have to follow the policy you wrote because you can always change it retrospecctively. see? see how the law fails to work in new zealand??
the judge also says that the chief executive with the statutory function of upholding the quality and integrity of nz university degrees and, particularly, ensuring that the complaints resolution practice complies with our international obligations to protect (and not target and destroy) whistleblowers...
he claims that it is not his statutory responsibility to get students or faculties complaints to a meeting of the new zealand vice chancellors committee (where the person can personally bring thier allegations before the committee for hteir consideration) or get complaints to police.
in fact, justice isac (hauled out of retirement for precisely this occasion) thoguht that it would be violating the statutory laws of new zealand if chris whelan in his capaciaty as CE of the NZVCC with statutory function of upholding quality and integrity of NZ university qualifications were to get the evidence of wrongdoing to a meeting of the NZVCC and / or forward evidence to the police.
if he were to do anything other than quash the complaint / attmept to silence / ignore the complainant / arrange to persecute or blacklist he complaintant.. then he would be violating the statutory law of nz. interfering with the academic or intellectual or operational freedom of the public universities of new zealand to do whatever they want whenever they want because they want.
when what they want is for the studnets to pay the university, pay the university, pay the university, pay the university, keep 'working' for the university. keep handing the 'university' 'work' and paying the university. keeping doing 'work experience' for no credit while paying the university.
anything other than this would undermine or interfere with the qualiaty and integrity of our qualifications.
because, clearly, the main aim or goal or purpose or point is to comletetely and utterly undermine any perception of quality or integrity of our 'education' system.
also our judiciary.
the 'judiciary'.
thanks. jsutice isac. for your retirement volunteeringn judgment. or whatever that was supopsed to be...
Posted by alexandra_k on April 17, 2022, at 3:48:34
In reply to nz leading the world in slavery, posted by alexandra_k on April 17, 2022, at 0:14:25
maybe take a little detour to the virgin islands?
catch up with dear jeffrey epstein and co?so motivating and inspiring.
for sure.
Posted by alexandra_k on April 17, 2022, at 3:57:25
In reply to Re: nz leading the world in slavery, posted by alexandra_k on April 17, 2022, at 3:48:34
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/67949918/prime-minister-john-key-pulled-waitress-ponytail
just teasing lolz!!!
Posted by alexandra_k on April 17, 2022, at 4:06:30
In reply to Re: nz leading the world in slavery, posted by alexandra_k on April 17, 2022, at 3:48:34
my conduct (on the other hand) both in teaching and hospitality capacity has never been anything other than professional.
i don't think it would have been professionally appropriate for me to be grading essays on euthanasia the day of my fathers funeral. i would not have been able to be objective about the issue. i would not have been able to grade the essays on their academic merits on that day. that was why i withdrew from grading on that day. i was not able to do the work on that day.
that was not unprofessional of me.
i did not know that my father had lung cancer when i accepted the contract to work for 1 year. i was not offered any way of repairing for the work that i missed. if they had have said 'since you didn't do that we are going to need you to do something else' down the track (e.g., some grading for someone else) then i would have done it. no problems. but i couldn't see what to do to repair and nobody offered any suggestions for me...
so i'm not going to feel bad or guilty or whatever about it.
i don't expect things to be perfect in the world. but i do expect people to be trying to work towards making things better. rather than people being too scared to speak up or make any movements in that direction.
that's how things feel here. all this stuff about how they are going to introduce things so that people can complain... i don't think that anybody here will view these measures as anything other than collecting up information about who to black-list or write up for the first available draft.
i think that people are geninely afraid, here, that complaining, or saying that certain practices are not okay (e.g., certain government practices etc)... will amount to them being targeted for bad treatment etc. beign excluded from funding etc. being drafted etc.
that if the universities, for example, ask employees to say if they feel they are not academically free to speak up about that... they will only collect up the names to see who to cut so that the results of the next survery will be better.
the government seems to focus on how to shut things down more quickly.
like how they got to see what every other nation was (according to one ideology) able to accomplish with various policies aroudn removing and relocating people's children. other nations did various things in this regards or respect. new zealand waited until the countries had given public apologies about all the harms they had done with these practices. before the nz government really decided to follow along last... only to lead the world in inflicting as much harm in as short a space of time as possible. to harm as many as htey could... they knew about the harmfulness of the practices before they really hunkered down to get going with them.
they knowingly hired and kept on staff and re-deployed known, documented, torturers and abusers and so on.
and they are still at it.
and they still refuse to process and progress and employ people who they have marked as people they would really rather be bullied to death.
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Social | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.