![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 1 to 16 of 16. This is the beginning of the thread.
Posted by Phillipa on September 23, 2009, at 3:49:05
In reply to Anxiety - I'm running out of options, posted by tiopenster on September 8, 2009, at 13:59:55
Sorry usually not like this might want to start a new thread? Love Phillipa
Posted by Lou Pilder on September 23, 2009, at 3:49:05
In reply to Re: Anxiety - I'm running out of options » tiopenster, posted by Phillipa on September 10, 2009, at 21:35:11
> Sorry usually not like this might want to start a new thread? Love Phillipa
Phillipa,
You wrote,[...Sorry...new thread?...]
I am unsure as to what you are using as criteria to suggest to the innitiator or even the members in this discussion, what you are suggesting. If you could answer the following, then I could have the opportunity to understand as to what your rationale could be to post such and respond to you.
A. What in you thinking would starting a new thread accomplish here?
B. If a new thread was started, would you want a different subject line? If so, what in your thinking could be a replacement for the subject line?
C. As to if this was accomplished, how could the changing of the thread help the innitiator to overcome his/her situation verses leaving it alone?
D. Would there be resrictions or exclusions in any new thread that you could propose?
E. other good and just concepts for starting a new thread.
Lou
Posted by bleauberry on September 23, 2009, at 3:49:05
In reply to Lou's request-fmdozdatcryrondafirhoz » Phillipa, posted by Lou Pilder on September 11, 2009, at 8:25:19
Lou you wrote:
> A. What in you thinking would starting a new thread accomplish here?
A. What rationale do you have in asking this question?
You wrote:
> B. If a new thread was started, would you want a different subject line? If so, what in your thinking could be a replacement for the subject line?B. What outcome do you hope to gain if these questions are answered?
You wrote:
> C. As to if this was accomplished, how could the changing of the thread help the innitiator to overcome his/her situation verses leaving it alone?C. If the above questions were answered, what would its implications be to mankind?
You wrote:
> D. Would there be resrictions or exclusions in any new thread that you could propose?D. As to the definition of the words restrictions and exclusions, in what context do you use these words?
You wrote:
> E. other good and just concepts for starting a new thread.E. Is this half sentence presented purposefully or accidentally, and if so, what was the reasoning for doing so?
> Lou
Depending on the dictionary referenced, or on the person asked, the word BIZARRE might include such descriptions as: Odd, weird, not-of-this-planet, freaky.
BB wrote to Lou:
F. If you were to continue the above paragraph, what words or phrases would you utilize to describe said word BIZARRE?BB wrote to Lou:
What is the meaning of fmdozdatcryondafirhoz.G. What is the function for this set of letters and what does it mean?
Posted by Lou Pilder on September 23, 2009, at 3:51:28
In reply to , posted by on December 31, 1969, at 18:00:00
> Lou you wrote:
>
> > A. What in you thinking would starting a new thread accomplish here?
>
> A. What rationale do you have in asking this question?
>
> You wrote:
> > B. If a new thread was started, would you want a different subject line? If so, what in your thinking could be a replacement for the subject line?
>
> B. What outcome do you hope to gain if these questions are answered?
>
> You wrote:
> > C. As to if this was accomplished, how could the changing of the thread help the innitiator to overcome his/her situation verses leaving it alone?
>
> C. If the above questions were answered, what would its implications be to mankind?
>
> You wrote:
> > D. Would there be resrictions or exclusions in any new thread that you could propose?
>
> D. As to the definition of the words restrictions and exclusions, in what context do you use these words?
>
> You wrote:
> > E. other good and just concepts for starting a new thread.
>
> E. Is this half sentence presented purposefully or accidentally, and if so, what was the reasoning for doing so?
>
> > Lou
>
> Depending on the dictionary referenced, or on the person asked, the word BIZARRE might include such descriptions as: Odd, weird, not-of-this-planet, freaky.
>
> BB wrote to Lou:
> F. If you were to continue the above paragraph, what words or phrases would you utilize to describe said word BIZARRE?
>
> BB wrote to Lou:
> What is the meaning of fmdozdatcryondafirhoz.
>
> G. What is the function for this set of letters and what does it mean?
>
> bb,
You asked,[...what is the meaning of fmdozdatcryondafirhoz...]
The letters in my subject line depict aspects of the great overwiew from my perspective of this site. The words or letter when deciphered reveal a revelation that as of now can not be revealed by me. There will be a revelation in the time of the end (not the end of the age)let the reader understand, for it will then be plainly visible as to the fitting together of the words that at this time no man knows except me. It is hidden for a purpose that will be revealed.
You see, I came here wanting to offer people a new song to sing. And it is music that has not been heard for the ears do not hear it. It is music in the heart, and it is the Water of Life and the Bread of Life that could lift one out of the darkness and into a marvelous light.
The words in the subject lines are codes that reveal this new song. This new song will be a song of praise, for in the day that you hear the song, you will be lifted up and your soul brought out from death and the evening of weeping will be turned to joy and dancing in the morning.
Lou
Posted by bleauberry on September 23, 2009, at 3:51:28
In reply to Lou's reply-fmdozdatcryrondafirhoz » bleauberry, posted by Lou Pilder on September 13, 2009, at 16:11:20
> You asked,[...what is the meaning of fmdozdatcryondafirhoz...]
> The letters in my subject line depict aspects of the great overwiew from my perspective of this site. The words or letter when deciphered reveal a revelation that as of now can not be revealed by me. There will be a revelation in the time of the end (not the end of the age)let the reader understand, for it will then be plainly visible as to the fitting together of the words that at this time no man knows except me. It is hidden for a purpose that will be revealed.
> You see, I came here wanting to offer people a new song to sing. And it is music that has not been heard for the ears do not hear it. It is music in the heart, and it is the Water of Life and the Bread of Life that could lift one out of the darkness and into a marvelous light.
> The words in the subject lines are codes that reveal this new song. This new song will be a song of praise, for in the day that you hear the song, you will be lifted up and your soul brought out from death and the evening of weeping will be turned to joy and dancing in the morning.
> Lou
>
>
>
Why would you deny or postpone such great healing from those that need it at this time?
Posted by Sigismund on September 23, 2009, at 3:51:28
In reply to Lou's reply-fmdozdatcryrondafirhoz » bleauberry, posted by Lou Pilder on September 13, 2009, at 16:11:20
God bless you, Lou.
>You see, I came here wanting to offer people a new song to sing. And it is music that has not been heard for the ears do not hear it. It is music in the heart, and it is the Water of Life and the Bread of Life that could lift one out of the darkness and into a marvelous light.
The words in the subject lines are codes that reveal this new song. This new song will be a song of praise, for in the day that you hear the song, you will be lifted up and your soul brought out from death and the evening of weeping will be turned to joy and dancing in the morning.
Posted by Lou Pilder on September 23, 2009, at 3:51:28
In reply to Re: Lou's reply-fmdozdatcryrondafirhoz » Lou Pilder, posted by bleauberry on September 13, 2009, at 17:58:54
> > You asked,[...what is the meaning of fmdozdatcryondafirhoz...]
> > The letters in my subject line depict aspects of the great overwiew from my perspective of this site. The words or letter when deciphered reveal a revelation that as of now can not be revealed by me. There will be a revelation in the time of the end (not the end of the age)let the reader understand, for it will then be plainly visible as to the fitting together of the words that at this time no man knows except me. It is hidden for a purpose that will be revealed.
> > You see, I came here wanting to offer people a new song to sing. And it is music that has not been heard for the ears do not hear it. It is music in the heart, and it is the Water of Life and the Bread of Life that could lift one out of the darkness and into a marvelous light.
> > The words in the subject lines are codes that reveal this new song. This new song will be a song of praise, for in the day that you hear the song, you will be lifted up and your soul brought out from death and the evening of weeping will be turned to joy and dancing in the morning.
> > Lou
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> Why would you deny or postpone such great healing from those that need it at this time?
>bb,
You wrote,[...Why would {you}...?...].
I would very much like to post what you are refering to. One reason for the delay is that there are numerous outstanding requests from me to Mr. Hsiung that if they were answered, I could have the opportunity to proceed in relation to what his answers could or could not clarify. He has posted a threat to me to expell me from this community if I was to post what has been revealed to me, which is what I believe, concerning a commandment from my God to me which is the foundation a Judaism. This raises the question to me as to if I could or could not post anything at all that could be related to the foundation of Judaism since there is that threat to expell me if I post what I believe in relation to what has been revealed to me as a Jew. I also am unsure as per other rules made to me as to if I could post the link to Mr. Hsiung's post that is the threat to expell me from this commuunity. You could email me for this if you like.
Some threads could offer more clarification in regards to this ongoing situation here that prevents me from knowing if I can or can not post in regards to your concern. Here is a link to a post in one thread and if you could go through the posts there I think that there could be more clarification as to what you posted here as to why I have not posted more concerning the aspects that you wonder why I havn't posted such yet.
Try the first link here nad then also the second link and go through the links and posts in them to perhaps see more of this ongoing situation as to if it expalins or not to you why there is a delay.
Lou
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20081228/msgs/875259.html
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20090529/msgs/898369.html
Posted by Lou Pilder on September 23, 2009, at 3:51:28
In reply to Re: Lou's request -vudupsi, posted by bleauberry on September 9, 2009, at 21:28:39
>
> >
> > bb,
> > You wrote,[...certain meds..work on certain symptoms, the opposite is true...certain meds which.. will not work...>will< work on you..].
>
> Interesting editing of my words. It kind of twists what I actually said.
>
> > I am interested in any authority that you may have to substantiate such.
>
> I am an authority on nothing except playing outrageous guitar. That, my friend, I am an authority on.
>
> (A), If you could post here a link to an article that shows such, then I could have a better understanding of this and respond accordingly.
>
> www.pubmed.com Roam at will.
>
> (B), In,[...will work on... you...], (redacted by respondent)
> > Lou
>
> Hi Lou,
>
> I am not an authority on anything except live guitar performance.
>
> I thought I gave some good examples already.
>
> Ritalin can make kids calm. What, a stimulant will calm someone down? Are you kidding? You don't need any clinical studies for that. Just visit some classrooms. Someone could actually feel tired or sleepy on an amphetamine? Are you kidding? Well, the archives here have enough examples of that to show it happens. Actually, right on this very page right now.
>
> Me and Milnacipran. Now that made no sense at all. That drug should have wired me out. To calm me down the way it did was weird. And sleep, gosh, awesome sleep. How the heck do you increase norepinephrine and sleep good? That makes no sense to me. Milnacipran is not prescribed for anxiety, plain and simple. So why is it that it worked so well when all the obvious contenders didn't?
>
> Go to pubmed and do some searching on your questions about studies showing how things have paradoxical effects. There is a lot there. I'm sorry, I don't bookmark every one of them, though I have read thousands of them.
>
> bb,
You wrote,[...I am an authority...on playing outrageous guitar...]
Could you click on this link and it brings up another link that I would like any authoritative appraisal of yours concerning the guitar played there?
Lou
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/social/20090513/msgs/895504.html
Posted by Phillipa on September 23, 2009, at 3:51:28
In reply to Re: Lou's request -ghetarappraisal » bleauberry, posted by Lou Pilder on September 16, 2009, at 15:17:49
Lou this is the meds board not admin. Phillipa Cam we get back to the original post posted?
Posted by Lou Pilder on September 23, 2009, at 3:51:28
In reply to Re: Lou's request -ghetarappraisal » Lou Pilder, posted by Phillipa on September 16, 2009, at 19:54:57
> Lou this is the meds board not admin. Phillipa Cam we get back to the original post posted?
Phillipa,
You wrtote,
[...this is the meds board not admin...Ca(n) we get back to the original post posted?...]
I am unsure as to what you are wanting to mean to me here and to what others could think about me from what you posted here to me. If you could post answers to the following here, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly.
A. In,[...this is the meds board not admin...]
1.what promted you in the post that you used to respond to of mine, if that is the post in question to you, to use {admin}?
2. If you are wanting to mean that my post in question by you is of the nature that it is administrative overall, what criteria do you use to qualify the post to that catagory?
B. In,[...Ca(n) we get back to the original post posted?...],
1.Is there something in my post in question by you that prevents you or anyone else from responding to the original post posted? If so, could you post that here?
2. My post is a response to another member, not the members at large. It is specific to bleauberry, as that member wrote something to me that I responded to for I wanted to have dialog with that member only from what that member posted to me. Others could also join the discussion.
3. In your entire post to me, do you think others could perceive my character in a particular light as a result of reading your post to me? If not, could you post here why not? If they could, what light could in your thinking others perceive me in as that I responded to bleauberry in the post in question?
C. How do you feel when you see that I am having the type of dialog with bleauberry that you are posting to me about?
D. If you have feelings about me from what you see in that I responded to bleauberry with the post in question by you, do you know what is causing that or those feelings?
E. If you object to me posting a response to bleauberry to what that member posted to me here, what cou;d you propose to me as an alternative to my responding to bleauberry with the post in question so that whatever could have prompted you to post to me here what you posted would not have been posted to me? Could you include why if you have an alternative to ptopose to me?
F. If you have feelings about me posting the post in question to bleauberry, do you have those same feelings or different feelings when you see posts from other members responding to posts directed to them by another member in a similar nature as my request to bleauberry by other members here?
G. How long (redacted by respondent)
Lou
Posted by Lou Pilder on September 23, 2009, at 3:51:29
In reply to Lou's reply-ahpsasntnvchrtr » Phillipa, posted by Lou Pilder on September 17, 2009, at 6:35:33
> > Lou this is the meds board not admin. Phillipa Cam we get back to the original post posted?
>
> Phillipa,
> You wrtote,
> [...this is the meds board not admin...Ca(n) we get back to the original post posted?...]
> I am unsure as to what you are wanting to mean to me here and to what others could think about me from what you posted here to me. If you could post answers to the following here, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly.
> A. In,[...this is the meds board not admin...]
> 1.what promted you in the post that you used to respond to of mine, if that is the post in question to you, to use {admin}?
> 2. If you are wanting to mean that my post in question by you is of the nature that it is administrative overall, what criteria do you use to qualify the post to that catagory?
> B. In,[...Ca(n) we get back to the original post posted?...],
> 1.Is there something in my post in question by you that prevents you or anyone else from responding to the original post posted? If so, could you post that here?
> 2. My post is a response to another member, not the members at large. It is specific to bleauberry, as that member wrote something to me that I responded to for I wanted to have dialog with that member only from what that member posted to me. Others could also join the discussion.
> 3. In your entire post to me, do you think others could perceive my character in a particular light as a result of reading your post to me? If not, could you post here why not? If they could, what light could in your thinking others perceive me in as that I responded to bleauberry in the post in question?
> C. How do you feel when you see that I am having the type of dialog with bleauberry that you are posting to me about?
> D. If you have feelings about me from what you see in that I responded to bleauberry with the post in question by you, do you know what is causing that or those feelings?
> E. If you object to me posting a response to bleauberry to what that member posted to me here, what cou;d you propose to me as an alternative to my responding to bleauberry with the post in question so that whatever could have prompted you to post to me here what you posted would not have been posted to me? Could you include why if you have an alternative to ptopose to me?
> F. If you have feelings about me posting the post in question to bleauberry, do you have those same feelings or different feelings when you see posts from other members responding to posts directed to them by another member in a similar nature as my request to bleauberry by other members here?
> G. How long (redacted by respondent)
> LouPhillipa,
In part F, let us consider the following as examples to use in any answer that you may post here.
In the following, members have posted to me in relation to requesting clarification or such from what I had posted to them.
Lou
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20090912/msgs/916949.html
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20090902/msgs/916544.html
Posted by Phillipa on September 23, 2009, at 3:51:29
In reply to , posted by on December 31, 1969, at 18:00:00
Lou very simply without explaining each and every question. The poor person who started the thread topic is anxiety and should be about anxiety. Some tried to get back on topic. My suggestion would be to have the discussion via babblemail. Thanks Phillipa
Posted by manic666 on September 23, 2009, at 12:27:10
In reply to Re: Anxiety - I'm running out of options » tiopenster, posted by Phillipa on September 23, 2009, at 3:49:05
we have not come to praise ceasar///, but to kill the bastard. written a quoted by manic
Posted by Kath on September 23, 2009, at 20:32:30
In reply to Lou's reply to Phillipa-part F, posted by Lou Pilder on September 23, 2009, at 3:51:29
Hi Lou, I've copied Phillipa's post below because I agree with it. The person who wrote the original post of this thread is reaching out from a very very painful & what must be scarey place. I think it would be nice to keep the thread to that topic & if something comes up that veers from the original topic, maybe a new thread could be started. I think this would be a kind, supportive & respectful thing to do for the original poster.
Sincerely Kath
>Lou very simply without explaining each and every question. The poor person who started the thread topic is anxiety and should be about anxiety. Some tried to get back on topic. My suggestion would be to have the discussion via babblemail. Thanks Phillipa
Posted by Phillipa on September 23, 2009, at 20:35:54
In reply to Re: Anxiety - I'm running out of options » tiopenster, posted by Phillipa on September 23, 2009, at 3:49:05
Thinking we might want to babblemail the original poster as new and might not know what a redirest is? Just a thought. Will go back and see if mail is on. Love Phillipa
Posted by Kath on September 24, 2009, at 11:39:49
In reply to Re: Anxiety - I'm running out of options » Phillipa, posted by Phillipa on September 23, 2009, at 20:35:54
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Social | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.