Shown: posts 1 to 3 of 3. This is the beginning of the thread.
Posted by Ame Sans Vie on August 14, 2003, at 17:46:32
Well, since Medicaid will stop covering my therapy after January 5, I'm considering seeing my therapist weekly or even bi-weekly until then in hopes that I can receive maximum benefit from what little time I have left.
But I wonder, is it frequency of the sessions or total length of time spent in therapy that really matters?
Posted by Dinah on August 14, 2003, at 20:10:06
In reply to Frequency of therapy sessions, posted by Ame Sans Vie on August 14, 2003, at 17:46:32
I dunno. I suspect it's a number of variables. Going more frequently keeps you immersed in what you're doing. Going longer gives your brain more time to take in changes. But I've heard that a lot of good work can be done when there's a final termination date set as well. That it's a big motivator to speed change.
What does your therapist think?
Posted by silmarilone on August 14, 2003, at 22:44:04
In reply to Re: Frequency of therapy sessions » Ame Sans Vie, posted by Dinah on August 14, 2003, at 20:10:06
Medicare still pays for therapy, but I wonder how it works when you have both. I mean, Medicare pays first, then medi-cal (california's version of medicaid) picks up the co-payments and deductibles. If medicaid does NOT pay for therapy but medicare DOES, will medicaid refuse to pick up the copay?
hmmmm
confusing
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Psychology | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.