Psycho-Babble Administration Thread 1054296

Shown: posts 1 to 7 of 7. This is the beginning of the thread.

 

Re: Lou's reply- » Lou Pilder

Posted by fiat500 on November 13, 2013, at 23:18:36

In reply to Lou's reply- » lazylizard, posted by Lou Pilder on November 12, 2013, at 17:34:07

Lou,

You write as if you have the answer to all ills when it comes to the mind. I hope that you are open to the idea that you come across as "A Know It All". There are 8 billion brains on this planet none of which are biochemically exactly alike. People react differently to foods, beverages, situations that arise in life etc. No two people are completely similar so it is important to remember that we could react differently. I hope that you are open to the idea that you could be over generalizing and be making a blanket in thinking that your way is the right way. What has worked for you might work for someone else but might not. Who knows what your response will be. Looking at your previous responses I might (not sure thought so I am not over generalizing) expect you to analyze my sentences and pick up on my mistakes that I might have have made in my response and that is great. Just please, if you can, be open to the idea that you might, just might not have all the answers. Here is a definition of a "Know It All" that I found in Wikipedia. It might give you an idea as to how your responses reflect on others. I am sure you mean well but again it would be great for you to be open to the idea that for some people your responses are unhelpful and are not the way to his/her recovery.

"A know-it-all will invariably dispute others. For instance, someone may present a conflicting opinion or make a recommendation, but the know-it-all will act as though it had already been suggested, analyzed, and discounted. A know-it-all may also disregard or devalue advice from someone who actually has the knowledge the know-it-all purports to have. Know-it-all may also refer to a legitimate expert who flaunts his or her knowledge".

 

Lou's reply-the seed » fiat500

Posted by Lou Pilder on November 13, 2013, at 23:18:37

In reply to Re: Lou's reply- » Lou Pilder, posted by fiat500 on November 13, 2013, at 13:28:01

> Lou,
>
> You write as if you have the answer to all ills when it comes to the mind. I hope that you are open to the idea that you come across as "A Know It All". There are 8 billion brains on this planet none of which are biochemically exactly alike. People react differently to foods, beverages, situations that arise in life etc. No two people are completely similar so it is important to remember that we could react differently. I hope that you are open to the idea that you could be over generalizing and be making a blanket in thinking that your way is the right way. What has worked for you might work for someone else but might not. Who knows what your response will be. Looking at your previous responses I might (not sure thought so I am not over generalizing) expect you to analyze my sentences and pick up on my mistakes that I might have have made in my response and that is great. Just please, if you can, be open to the idea that you might, just might not have all the answers. Here is a definition of a "Know It All" that I found in Wikipedia. It might give you an idea as to how your responses reflect on others. I am sure you mean well but again it would be great for you to be open to the idea that for some people your responses are unhelpful and are not the way to his/her recovery.
>
> "A know-it-all will invariably dispute others. For instance, someone may present a conflicting opinion or make a recommendation, but the know-it-all will act as though it had already been suggested, analyzed, and discounted. A know-it-all may also disregard or devalue advice from someone who actually has the knowledge the know-it-all purports to have. Know-it-all may also refer to a legitimate expert who flaunts his or her knowledge".

fiat500,
You wrote,[...making a blanket in thinking that your way is the right way...].
I have stated here over and over that I know of two ways to overcome depression and addiction, one being by human achievement and the other by divine accomplishment. I am prevented from posting here what has been revealed to me that comes from a Jewish perspective due to the prohibitions posted to me here from Mr Hsiung. I have not posted what mysteries of the new realm that have been revealed to me, so I do not know how you could know what {my way} is. It is not my way, but what has been revealed to me that comes from the God that the Jews give service and worship to. What has been revealed to me is that one can have a new heart, a new spirit, which transforms their minds from being in a realm of depression and addiction into a marvelous light that dispels the darkness of despair and can bring healing that could open up the Gates of the prison of death to free the captives and be alive forever more. The Rider is not Christiandom's Jesus, but a Spirit that comes down from above and transforms one in the death realm to be brought into a realm of abundant life. Thisrealm is offered freely and without price and anyone can come to partake in this new realm by drinking the waters of life. I have come here to lead people to the water of life. Those that want to take drugs that could kill them or give them Tardive Dyskinesia or diabetes or a blood disease of liver failure or induce a mind-altered state to compel them to kill themselves and/or others are free to do so. You can say to me that you hope that I can be open to the idea that I come across as a "KNOW It All", but I say to you that I have been to the Land of that realm of life of the transformed and have seen The Promised Land. I may not get anyone here to go there with me, but I may leave a seed that could grow in fertile ground to someone that could read this later. And that seed may receive water and light to germinate. I am prohibited by Mr Hsiung's prohibitions to me to tell you where you can drink the water and receive the light to germinate the seed of the new life, and I am so sorry , my friend.
Lou

 

Re: Lou's reply-the seed » Lou Pilder

Posted by fiat500 on November 13, 2013, at 23:18:38

In reply to Lou's reply-the seed » fiat500, posted by Lou Pilder on November 13, 2013, at 16:06:11

Thank you for your response Lou. Don't feel sorry at all as unlike you I feel so fortunate to be able to hear other's points of view, support and respect them and learn from other's' without casting judgement and thinking that I know better than them.

 

Lou's response-huzvew?

Posted by Lou Pilder on November 13, 2013, at 23:23:52

In reply to , posted by on December 31, 1969, at 18:00:00

> Thank you for your response Lou. Don't feel sorry at all as unlike you I feel so fortunate to be able to hear other's points of view, support and respect them and learn from other's' without casting judgement and thinking that I know better than them.
>
> Friends,
It is written here by fiat500 that he/she is unlike me. Fiat500 says that he/she is able to hear other's point of view (and I am not?). Fiat500 says that he/she is able to support and respect them, (and I am not?). Fiat500 says that he/she is without casting judgment (and I am?). Fiat500 says that he/she is not saying that he/she knows better than them (and I am saying that I do know better than them?)
The issue in my post is that I am sorry that Mr Hsiung has posted the prohibitions to me that prevent me from posting here from a Jewish perspective as revealed to me and that so readers can not receive from me what has been revealed to me that could lead you out of the darkness of depression and addiction and death, and into a marvelous light of peace and abundant life. I am sorry because what is not prohibited is the advocating of taking mind-altering drugs that could maim and kill not only those that take them, but the victims of those that the drugs induce aggression and homicidal thinking and they murder even their own mother.
You see, I do know what these drugs do to the mind. And others know it also. The chemicals in a lot of them were used in insecticides and agents to kill vermin and then people. They are {nerve agents} and today there are gases used to kill thousands of people in mass that have the same chemical as many antidepressants. I do know what causes tardive dyskinesia. And the injury to the brain is an injury that I know how one can be healed of. This healing is prohibited for me to post here due to the prohibitions from Mr. Hsiung to me. And why is that? Is not the rule here that different points of view are encouraged? Whose point of view then is prohibited? Mine from a Jewish perspective as revealed to me or whatever point of view that fiat500 is referring to?
Another issue here is that I am not stopping anyone from using human achievement as a means to overcome addiction and depression. The issue here is that I am stopped from posting about divine accomplishment from a Jewish perspective as revealed to me. And I am sorry that you readers are deprived from hearing from me in that respect. For if I was not prohibited by Mr. Hsiung to post from a Jewish perspective as revealed to me, I think that lives could be saved, life-ruining conditions and addictions could be prevented and parents that could hear from me could have their children have the opportunity to live a free and natural life and not be maimed for life from these drugs, or killed by them.
Lou
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WlVxv5ag0pQ

>
>
>

 

Re: Lou's response-huzvew? » Lou Pilder

Posted by Fiat500 on November 13, 2013, at 23:26:18

In reply to , posted by on December 31, 1969, at 18:00:00

You ask "am I not?" four times and in my opinion "you are not" in all four instances. I don't see any respect, support and especially I don't see you listening to other's points of view in my opinion in your responses. I see you instilling fear and pushing your agenda on other's time and time again with your same stock response. Take care of yourself Lou.

 

Lou's reply-ehyjen/stkrepson

Posted by Lou Pilder on November 14, 2013, at 13:25:24

In reply to Re: Lou's response-huzvew? » Lou Pilder, posted by Fiat500 on November 13, 2013, at 23:26:18

> You ask "am I not?" four times and in my opinion "you are not" in all four instances. I don't see any respect, support and especially I don't see you listening to other's points of view in my opinion in your responses. I see you instilling fear and pushing your agenda on other's time and time again with your same stock response. Take care of yourself Lou.

fiat500
what is my agenda and what is the same stock response?
Lou

 

Re: respect, support and listening to others » Fiat500

Posted by Dr. Bob on November 14, 2013, at 22:44:18

In reply to Re: Lou's response-huzvew? » Lou Pilder, posted by Fiat500 on November 13, 2013, at 23:26:18

> I don't see any respect, support and especially I don't see you listening to other's points of view

Be the change you wish to see. Might there be some way you could listen to, respect, and even support Lou's point of view?

Bob


This is the end of the thread.


Show another thread

URL of post in thread:


Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ


[dr. bob] Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD, bob@dr-bob.org

Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.