![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 1 to 7 of 7. This is the beginning of the thread.
Posted by Phillipa on June 15, 2012, at 20:40:19
Dr Bob at the request of other posters and myself how do you see the future of psychobabble. Due to low posting rates do you see shutting other board down and having one or completly closing the site? Phillipa
Posted by Lou Pilder on June 17, 2012, at 8:59:58
In reply to Dr Bob Is Babble Going To Close?, posted by Phillipa on June 15, 2012, at 20:40:19
> Dr Bob at the request of other posters and myself how do you see the future of psychobabble. Due to low posting rates do you see shutting other board down and having one or completly closing the site? Phillipa
Phillipa,
You have brought up an important aspect here to me. You see, if the site closes, that may cause my requests to not be addressed by Mr. Hsiung if in a close of a site the posts can not be retrieved. But then again, if the posts can not be retrieved, then the content that IMHHO could arouse antisemitic feelings in posts that are allowed to stand and I have a request to Mr Hsiung that is outstanding,would also not be seen. Now if the posts here could be seen somehow in a closure of a site, then that coud bring up other issues.
For instance, here is a post that my requests to Mr. Hsiung are outstanding. The post also shows my concern for the requests from me being outstanding and the consequences to Jews that IMHO have the potential for there to be consequences to Jews if the statements in question that are posted here remain outstanding, then IMO a Jew could be subject to antisemitic violence by the nature that the posts in question, which can be found here on the admin board and I will ost links to in this thread forthcoming, could be seen to be {supportive} by some because Mr. Hsiung states that support takes precedence and one match could start a forest fire so he does not wait to sanction what could lead someone to feel put down or accused and such.
Here is a link to a post with outstanding requests from me and I invite all to post from your perspective in that thread. If you could, then I could have a better understanding of what members that post there consider to be supportive.
Lou
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20110117/msgs/999432.html
Posted by Phillipa on June 17, 2012, at 21:15:51
In reply to Lou's response-pshapoart » Phillipa, posted by Lou Pilder on June 17, 2012, at 8:59:58
Lou if babble closes it's gone never to return and with it your and I'm sure other's requests. So that would be it. No answers to your outstanding requests. Will this cause you to be personally harmed? Phillipa
Posted by Lou Pilder on June 18, 2012, at 13:21:30
In reply to Re: Lou's response-pshapoart » Lou Pilder, posted by Phillipa on June 17, 2012, at 21:15:51
> Lou if babble closes it's gone never to return and with it your and I'm sure other's requests. So that would be it. No answers to your outstanding requests. Will this cause you to be personally harmed? Phillipa
Phillipa,
You wrote,[...no answers to your outstanding requests...cause you to be..harmed?...].
If the archives are not able to be actuated in a closure, there are still the posts that are in other sites that were typed out, not in a link.
Then there could be a site that has all of the posts, such as the wayback machine.
You see, Mr. Hsiung has made prohibitions to me here that prevent me from posting my response to the posts in question. One way that I am prevented from posting my response is that I have requests to him that if they were responded to, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly. You see, if there is not a response posted, then my opportunity to respond is not available, for I need to know what is unknown to be able to reveal what is not visible. I can post to what is seen. So not untill I can see it, could I know it. Other posters here also do not have to post answers to requests to them to clarify what they wrote, which also can prevent me from posting a response to what they wrote, if I have requests to them to clarify what they wrote.
The idea of what support is comes into play here, for Mr. Hsiung's TOS states that support takes precedence. I took him at his word in all of his rules here and what he has posted about his thinking, in particular that he states that in his thinking he does what will be good for this community as a whole. The historical paralles to that type of thinking go back before 1933, but there are other prohibitions to me here from Mr. Hsiung that could prevent me from posting here the response to him that I would like to. You see, is not the fact that there are requests from me to Mr Hsiung that are outstanding for days, weeks months and years thearfore could have the potential for some others to think, by his TOS, that those requests/notifications left outstanding will be good for this community as a whole? And if anyone could think that, could that thearfore put Jews at risk to being victims of antisemitic violence, or victims of bullies in schools, or shot at by those in a drug induced state that may have visited here and saw those type of statements being allowed to stand which IMHHHO could arouse antisemitic feelings and give some a (false) feeling of superiority toward Jews and target a Jew for murder? Has not the historical record shown this to happen when a leader of a community allows statement to stand that could arouse antisemitic feelings? This is one reason why I ask him to post his rationales. If he did, then I think that I could respond here like you have never seen, and (redacted by respondent).
Lou
Posted by Lou Pilder on June 18, 2012, at 14:57:37
In reply to Lou's reply-gudphoardhekahmunitee » Phillipa, posted by Lou Pilder on June 18, 2012, at 13:21:30
> > Lou if babble closes it's gone never to return and with it your and I'm sure other's requests. So that would be it. No answers to your outstanding requests. Will this cause you to be personally harmed? Phillipa
>
> Phillipa,
> You wrote,[...no answers to your outstanding requests...cause you to be..harmed?...].
> If the archives are not able to be actuated in a closure, there are still the posts that are in other sites that were typed out, not in a link.
> Then there could be a site that has all of the posts, such as the wayback machine.
> You see, Mr. Hsiung has made prohibitions to me here that prevent me from posting my response to the posts in question. One way that I am prevented from posting my response is that I have requests to him that if they were responded to, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly. You see, if there is not a response posted, then my opportunity to respond is not available, for I need to know what is unknown to be able to reveal what is not visible. I can post to what is seen. So not untill I can see it, could I know it. Other posters here also do not have to post answers to requests to them to clarify what they wrote, which also can prevent me from posting a response to what they wrote, if I have requests to them to clarify what they wrote.
> The idea of what support is comes into play here, for Mr. Hsiung's TOS states that support takes precedence. I took him at his word in all of his rules here and what he has posted about his thinking, in particular that he states that in his thinking he does what will be good for this community as a whole. The historical paralles to that type of thinking go back before 1933, but there are other prohibitions to me here from Mr. Hsiung that could prevent me from posting here the response to him that I would like to. You see, is not the fact that there are requests from me to Mr Hsiung that are outstanding for days, weeks months and years thearfore could have the potential for some others to think, by his TOS, that those requests/notifications left outstanding will be good for this community as a whole? And if anyone could think that, could that thearfore put Jews at risk to being victims of antisemitic violence, or victims of bullies in schools, or shot at by those in a drug induced state that may have visited here and saw those type of statements being allowed to stand which IMHHHO could arouse antisemitic feelings and give some a (false) feeling of superiority toward Jews and target a Jew for murder? Has not the historical record shown this to happen when a leader of a community allows statement to stand that could arouse antisemitic feelings? This is one reason why I ask him to post his rationales. If he did, then I think that I could respond here like you have never seen, and (redacted by respondent).
> Lou
>
> Friends,
Here is a post that exemplfies some of what involving the danger that I see here to the Jews and me as a Jew. I would like interested members here to post from their perspective to that post. If you could, then I could have a better understanding of what members here perceive as {support} and how Jews (redacted by respondent) here.
Lou
To see this post;
A. Go to the bottom of this page to the search box
B. Type in,[7713,7968]
there may be more than one. The one in question has the RE: in the heading.
>
Posted by Phillipa on June 18, 2012, at 20:59:06
In reply to Lou's reply-, posted by Lou Pilder on June 18, 2012, at 14:57:37
Lou with a closure of the site the messages on other google searches will also disapear. No worries. Phillipa
Posted by Lou Pilder on June 19, 2012, at 10:09:35
In reply to Re: Lou's reply- » Lou Pilder, posted by Phillipa on June 18, 2012, at 20:59:06
> Lou with a closure of the site the messages on other google searches will also disapear. No worries. Phillipa
Phillipa,
You wrote,[...searches will also disappear. No worries...].
There are posts from here that are typed in other sites and are not going to disappear even if this site closes. And then there are the other problems that I could face if this site is closed.
One is that the posts that IMHHO could arouse antisemitic feelings that are allowed to stand have been in the public domain for years. People searching for information can have these posts come up even from years ago. So I see this site as a book, with only the last page showing. But the other pages can be seen as a first page in a search, You see, when a site has archives, I consider each page to have the potential to be the first page. This then could be thought that there not a {past} here, for one can see any page now, the present, because of the fact that there are archives.
Now here is a post from here that has been typed in on another site that takes issue with that the statements. There are other issues involving the post, but since there are prohibitions to me here from Mr. Hsiung, I can not post the response that I would like to there. However, I invite interested members to post there from their perspective, and if they could, then I could have better undertsnding of member's that post there the perspective that they have concerning what {support} is and how Jews are (redacted by respondent) here.
Lou
To see this post:
A. Go to the search box at the end of this page
B. Type in;
[admin, abominations, 428781]
Now there could be three . It is usually the first one, but the others could be explored also to see what is at issue here.. You will see [Lou's request to Dr Husing-|Psycho Babble] and the number{428781} will be in the colored strip
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.