![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 1 to 5 of 5. This is the beginning of the thread.
Posted by James K on September 12, 2006, at 19:17:31
If a post expresses a belief that is believed to attack the foundation of a belief system, and by theoretical extension, the believers of said system, and yet the belief in question is believed to attack the foundation of a separate but equal belief system and thus also the believers in question, is said post allowable under this site's civility guidelines; or is the question of the questioning of posts in regard to adherence to civility guidelines in regard to this site a more relevant question to be posed at this juncture given recent clarifications of procedure?
Posted by henrietta on September 12, 2006, at 19:47:35
In reply to Controversial Conundrum, posted by James K on September 12, 2006, at 19:17:31
My point exactly! (Just kidding) I've gone off the deepe end~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Posted by James K on September 12, 2006, at 20:04:04
In reply to Controversial Conundrum, posted by James K on September 12, 2006, at 19:17:31
Please substitute the phrase " response to the previously referenced post expresses a belief that " for the phrase " belief in question" in the first sentence.
Sorry, poor proofreading.
James k
Posted by James K on September 12, 2006, at 20:12:55
In reply to correction, posted by James K on September 12, 2006, at 20:04:04
James K should never, in such a way as to implicate James K, express any opinion on outside controversial issues--particularly those of politics, alchohol reform, or sectarian religion. James K opposes no one. Concerning such matters he can express no views whatever.
I used to say it more elegantly, but James K third edition got lost during a binge. I've broken my 10th tradition again. perhaps.
I'm leaving admin for the foreseeable moment.
Posted by Dr. Bob on September 13, 2006, at 18:40:26
In reply to Controversial Conundrum, posted by James K on September 12, 2006, at 19:17:31
> If a post expresses a belief that is believed to attack the foundation of a belief system, and by theoretical extension, the believers of said system, and yet the [response to the previously referenced post expresses a belief that] is believed to attack the foundation of a separate but equal belief system and thus also the believers in question, is said post allowable under this site's civility guidelines; or is the question of the questioning of posts in regard to adherence to civility guidelines in regard to this site a more relevant question to be posed at this juncture given recent clarifications of procedure?
Do two wrongs make a right, is that the question?
Bob
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.