![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 1 to 8 of 8. This is the beginning of the thread.
Posted by gardenergirl on June 20, 2006, at 9:00:06
In reply to Re: relationship lessons..... » Larry Hoover, posted by ClearSkies on June 20, 2006, at 5:47:35
> I've seen a particular instance where uncivil expressions directed towards another poster has gone un-PCBd. I'm not going to link to it because I consider it shameful to perpetuate the pain it inflicted;
I understand and likely agree with not wanting to perpetuate pain. But I do wonder if you or someone else reported the post[s] at the time? Is it a case of someone deciding it was civil or rather that no one acted on it in a timely manner?
Thanks,
gg
Posted by ClearSkies on June 20, 2006, at 10:23:51
In reply to Re: relationship lessons..... » ClearSkies, posted by gardenergirl on June 20, 2006, at 9:00:06
> Is it a case of someone deciding it was civil or rather that no one acted on it in a timely manner?
>
> Thanks,
> ggIt was the timeliness that was lacking. The pain continues.
CS
Posted by gardenergirl on June 20, 2006, at 11:42:29
In reply to Re: relationship lessons..... » gardenergirl, posted by ClearSkies on June 20, 2006, at 10:23:51
> It was the timeliness that was lacking. The pain continues.
> CSI can understand that. Enough time goes by, and even if there is an intervention later, the horses are gone.
But just to clarify...do you know if it was reported? That's really the only sure way that I know of to make sure that something will get looked at by admin. I don't assume that every post is read by someone on admin, especially since we don't coordinate who reads what, and there is no expectation for any of us to read them all.
gg
Posted by Larry Hoover on June 20, 2006, at 11:59:28
In reply to Timeliness of interventions » ClearSkies, posted by gardenergirl on June 20, 2006, at 11:42:29
> I don't assume that every post is read by someone on admin, especially since we don't coordinate who reads what, and there is no expectation for any of us to read them all.
>
> gg???
Why is there no coordination?
Lar
Posted by gardenergirl on June 20, 2006, at 12:36:50
In reply to Re: Timeliness of interventions » gardenergirl, posted by Larry Hoover on June 20, 2006, at 11:59:28
I don't know. It hasn't seemed necessary until recently. Now unless it's specifically stated, I find it hard to know if Dr. Bob or others have read a thread and decided it was okay or have not read it and thus no action .
And I find that a difficult condition to "work" with.
gg
Posted by ClearSkies on June 20, 2006, at 12:51:39
In reply to Timeliness of interventions » ClearSkies, posted by gardenergirl on June 20, 2006, at 11:42:29
?? I have no way of knowing if it was reported or not - how would I know whether it had been or not?
*I* did not report it and boy do I wish I had. The thread was already cold by the time I saw it.
CS> > It was the timeliness that was lacking. The pain continues.
> > CS
>
> I can understand that. Enough time goes by, and even if there is an intervention later, the horses are gone.
>
> But just to clarify...do you know if it was reported? That's really the only sure way that I know of to make sure that something will get looked at by admin. I don't assume that every post is read by someone on admin, especially since we don't coordinate who reads what, and there is no expectation for any of us to read them all.
>
> gg
Posted by Dinah on June 20, 2006, at 13:16:44
In reply to Re: Timeliness of interventions » Larry Hoover, posted by gardenergirl on June 20, 2006, at 12:36:50
> I don't know. It hasn't seemed necessary until recently. Now unless it's specifically stated, I find it hard to know if Dr. Bob or others have read a thread and decided it was okay or have not read it and thus no action .
>
> And I find that a difficult condition to "work" with.
>
> ggPlease don't ever feel bad about acting on a thread you think I've seen. Sometimes I might skim and not see something, and sometimes I might read something differently than you might. And that's fine. Dr. Bob knows that reasonable people differ. Or sometimes I might feel too involved in the thread to be objective. I certainly will never be offended if you act on a thread where I didn't.
Dr. Bob is a different matter, of course.
Posted by gardenergirl on June 20, 2006, at 13:18:43
In reply to Re: Timeliness of interventions, posted by ClearSkies on June 20, 2006, at 12:51:39
> ?? I have no way of knowing if it was reported or not - how would I know whether it had been or not?
>
> *I* did not report it and boy do I wish I had. The thread was already cold by the time I saw it.I guess that's what I was asking, because unless someone told you, you reported it, or you saw a post about it, you're right. How could you know? I didn't mean to sound pointed towards you. I just wanted to know if it had been brought to anyone's attention.
It would be really awesome to have that "report post" button up and running.
gg
> CS
>
> > > It was the timeliness that was lacking. The pain continues.
> > > CS
> >
> > I can understand that. Enough time goes by, and even if there is an intervention later, the horses are gone.
> >
> > But just to clarify...do you know if it was reported? That's really the only sure way that I know of to make sure that something will get looked at by admin. I don't assume that every post is read by someone on admin, especially since we don't coordinate who reads what, and there is no expectation for any of us to read them all.
> >
> > gg
>
>
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.