Shown: posts 12 to 36 of 36. Go back in thread:
Posted by AMD on March 23, 2005, at 17:02:25
In reply to Re: sorry - +1 / +2 (week) system :-) (nm), posted by alexandra_k on March 13, 2005, at 15:06:00
Why was chemist blocked??
Posted by TofuEmmy on March 23, 2005, at 21:44:18
In reply to Re: sorry - +1 / +2 (week) system :-), posted by AMD on March 23, 2005, at 17:02:25
Chemist is not currently blocked. He's just not posting. I believe he is hibernating. Perhaps we'll see him poke his nose up in the spring. Hide the salmon.
em
Posted by AuntieMel on March 25, 2005, at 9:12:05
In reply to Re: sorry - +1 / +2 (week) system :-) » AMD, posted by TofuEmmy on March 23, 2005, at 21:44:18
Posted by chemist on March 28, 2005, at 12:16:36
In reply to Re: sorry - +1 / +2 (week) system :-) » AMD, posted by TofuEmmy on March 23, 2005, at 21:44:18
> Chemist is not currently blocked. He's just not posting. I believe he is hibernating. Perhaps we'll see him poke his nose up in the spring. Hide the salmon.
>
> emhello there, bane of your collective existence here...i was unaware that parole had, once again, been granted...
and what greater honor than to be the subject of a thread on the meds board with the very civil topic line ``Re: What Did He Do This Time?''
i recall a doonesbury comic from long ago - and i am not certain the origin of the following, yet from the funnies i did glean it - when one character stated to another that ``the only thing worse than being talked about is not being talked about.''
all the best, chemist
Posted by alexandra_k on March 28, 2005, at 15:28:13
In reply to peek-a-boo » TofuEmmy, posted by chemist on March 28, 2005, at 12:16:36
Posted by TofuEmmy on March 28, 2005, at 18:27:19
In reply to peek-a-boo » TofuEmmy, posted by chemist on March 28, 2005, at 12:16:36
Hey you loon. Lovely to see you here. I had apparently lost track of your many transgressions. Do you think you could manage to stay unblocked for, let's say...a week? Shall we start wagering in a Chemist's Next Block Pool? ;-)
Your Leather Auntie
Posted by paulbwell on March 31, 2005, at 18:09:08
In reply to peek-a-boo » TofuEmmy, posted by chemist on March 28, 2005, at 12:16:36
Come on over back to PB Main meds Board, there are several who wish to receive your advice.
Cheers
Posted by chemist on March 31, 2005, at 18:15:56
In reply to Chemist! Read, posted by paulbwell on March 31, 2005, at 18:09:08
> Come on over back to PB Main meds Board, there are several who wish to receive your advice.
>
> Cheershello there, apologies....on another note, i lost your email address in real life, mine has not changed....be well, chemist
Posted by Jai Narayan on March 31, 2005, at 19:08:16
In reply to peek-a-boo » TofuEmmy, posted by chemist on March 28, 2005, at 12:16:36
I am so glad you came back to babble.
Ja*
Posted by chemist on April 1, 2005, at 2:48:00
In reply to welcome back chemist...:), posted by Jai Narayan on March 31, 2005, at 19:08:16
> I am so glad you came back to babble.
> Ja*hello there, many thanks for the welcome back! be well, chemist
Posted by chemist on April 1, 2005, at 2:49:35
In reply to Re: peek-a-boo » chemist, posted by TofuEmmy on March 28, 2005, at 18:27:19
> Hey you loon. Lovely to see you here. I had apparently lost track of your many transgressions. Do you think you could manage to stay unblocked for, let's say...a week? Shall we start wagering in a Chemist's Next Block Pool? ;-)
>
> Your Leather Auntiehello there, auntie tofu! i have been unblocked for over a week, largely because i was unaware that my block was in fact over....but i will try...best, chemist
Posted by Larry Hoover on April 1, 2005, at 17:13:12
In reply to Re: peek-a-boo » TofuEmmy, posted by chemist on April 1, 2005, at 2:49:35
> hello there, auntie tofu! i have been unblocked for over a week, largely because i was unaware that my block was in fact over....but i will try...best, chemist
I ain't your auntie tofu, but I missed you fotu.
I think blocks should be given *with an expiry date*. Just saying eight weeks (or whatever) is different than saying "until 8 p.m. March 21".
Lar
Posted by Dr. Bob on April 2, 2005, at 20:34:52
In reply to Re: block expiry date » chemist, posted by Larry Hoover on April 1, 2005, at 17:13:12
> I think blocks should be given *with an expiry date*. Just saying eight weeks (or whatever) is different than saying "until 8 p.m. March 21".
The date of my post + the duration = the expiry date?
Bob
Posted by Larry Hoover on April 2, 2005, at 22:19:41
In reply to Re: block expiry date, posted by Dr. Bob on April 2, 2005, at 20:34:52
> > I think blocks should be given *with an expiry date*. Just saying eight weeks (or whatever) is different than saying "until 8 p.m. March 21".
>
> The date of my post + the duration = the expiry date?
>
> BobI think a more explicit date is going to be easier to remember, both for the blocked, and for the friends of the blocked. Yes, it's easy math, but explicit would be cool.
Lar
Posted by Dr. Bob on April 5, 2005, at 8:50:22
In reply to Re: block expiry date » Dr. Bob, posted by Larry Hoover on April 2, 2005, at 22:19:41
> Yes, it's easy math, but explicit would be cool.
So much cool, so little time. :-)
Bob
Posted by AuntieMel on April 5, 2005, at 12:16:10
In reply to Re: block expiry date, posted by Dr. Bob on April 5, 2005, at 8:50:22
I doesn't happen very often these days, either.
Posted by Spoc on April 5, 2005, at 14:52:14
In reply to Re: thanks - that comment made me laugh » Dr. Bob, posted by AuntieMel on April 5, 2005, at 12:16:10
... yes, I saw him permitting his funny bone on meds too, where the sentence someone had used that he wanted to correct had begun with "Can you say, (X)??" and Dr. Bob said, "Can you say, please don't say things that could lead others to feel (etc.)?"
I got a smile out of that too.
Posted by AuntieMel on April 5, 2005, at 14:57:55
In reply to Re: thanks - that comment made me laugh » AuntieMel, posted by Spoc on April 5, 2005, at 14:52:14
Posted by 10derHeart on April 5, 2005, at 16:28:58
In reply to Re: thanks - that comment made me laugh » Dr. Bob, posted by AuntieMel on April 5, 2005, at 12:16:10
> It doesn't happen very often these days, either.
Hmmm, would that be not often that you laugh?
Or, not often that Dr. Bob's comments make you (or anyone) laugh? ;-)
(Just playing around, Dr. B ;-))
(okay, okay, so I KNOW which one you meant (I think..) but I'm having a smart *ss sort of a day myself)
Posted by 10derHeart on April 5, 2005, at 16:31:02
In reply to Re: block expiry date, posted by Dr. Bob on April 5, 2005, at 8:50:22
Posted by sunny10 on April 6, 2005, at 14:16:26
In reply to Re: thanks - that comment made me laugh » AuntieMel, posted by 10derHeart on April 5, 2005, at 16:28:58
can we use the "some of us are over-medicated, thus logically challenged" excuse for the explicit date request, Dr. Cool?!?
Or, for myself, the "customarily confused and befuddled" excuse is usually more accurate!!
(Folks, I am attempting humor directed at myself and my reaction to Dr. Bob's joke... NOT an attempt to speak for anyone else, nor to imply that meds fry your brains, okay?????)
It is sometimes difficult to be confused, befuddled, humorous, AND politically correct, but ya gotta give me credit for TRYING...(maybe I just succeed at the confused and befuddled part?)
Posted by alexandra_k on April 6, 2005, at 14:48:30
In reply to Re: made me laugh, too, Dr. Bob, posted by sunny10 on April 6, 2005, at 14:16:26
ie me.
:-)
Posted by Larry Hoover on April 6, 2005, at 19:52:17
In reply to Re: block expiry date, posted by Dr. Bob on April 5, 2005, at 8:50:22
> > Yes, it's easy math, but explicit would be cool.
>
> So much cool, so little time. :-)
>
> BobQuestion, sir.
How do you keep track of blocks? Would it not be by date, not duration? Could you just let us know what's in your Big Book of Blocks?
Lar
Posted by Dr. Bob on April 8, 2005, at 2:47:18
In reply to Re: block expiry date » Dr. Bob, posted by Larry Hoover on April 6, 2005, at 19:52:17
> How do you keep track of blocks? Would it not be by date, not duration? Could you just let us know what's in your Big Book of Blocks?
To block someone, I enter the number of weeks and the server keeps track. Perl uses non-leap seconds since 00:00:00 UTC, January 1, 1970. :-)
Bob
Posted by chemist on April 9, 2005, at 1:59:11
In reply to Re: block expiry date » chemist, posted by Larry Hoover on April 1, 2005, at 17:13:12
> > hello there, auntie tofu! i have been unblocked for over a week, largely because i was unaware that my block was in fact over....but i will try...best, chemist
>
> I ain't your auntie tofu, but I missed you fotu.
>
> I think blocks should be given *with an expiry date*. Just saying eight weeks (or whatever) is different than saying "until 8 p.m. March 21".
>
> Larhi larry, just getting back...thank you for the hello, and i missed you - and numerous others - as well...
as for the expiriry date, i should have done what dr. bob describes below...perhaps i will write a little script for such and dispense...alas, do have a look at the substance abuse board for the latest chemistry challenge...yours, tjm
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD, bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.