Psycho-Babble Administration Thread 5148

Shown: posts 22 to 46 of 46. Go back in thread:

 

Re: an annoying little spelling correction » christophrejmc

Posted by krazy kat on May 23, 2002, at 19:20:20

In reply to an annoying little spelling correction » krazy kat, posted by christophrejmc on May 23, 2002, at 16:28:34

Thanks! I certainly can see how it could appear negative.

I used to be the Best speller in the world (really) and Depakote has robbed me of that (Topamax before Dep.). It's so frustrating...

- kk

 

personal to kid_a... » kid_A

Posted by krazy kat on May 23, 2002, at 19:23:38

In reply to all spelling corrections aside, yet... » christophrejmc, posted by kid_A on May 23, 2002, at 18:10:05

can't believe you brought up Howard! Let's discuss him further if you'd like on chat or via email (I just perused your post thus far, but doesn't matter I think..) :) Have some inside insight... (and she mysteriously winks...)

 

Re: I remember that one. » BeARdEdLaDY

Posted by krazy kat on May 23, 2002, at 19:30:07

In reply to I remember that one. » kid_A, posted by BeARdEdLaDY on May 23, 2002, at 18:36:16

Darling:

I want to start calling you this because I love your posts so.

My guess is that this, and Kid_A's posts will get a pbc b/c Some might find them offensive.

I made a post to Mark H. about a new book out, even in the book store in my little town of liberal Woodstock, NY re: the word n***er. I have not read it, but it looks fascinating. Didn't get a response.

Oh, I know, it was in the "swear words" thread.

Anyhoo, agree wholeheartedly with you, as usual - not Always, but Usually. :) And regardless, you're Always very verbose. (That's my word for the day... )

Take care.

= kk

 

origins of taboo words...

Posted by IsoM on May 24, 2002, at 0:00:24

In reply to personal to kid_a... » kid_A, posted by krazy kat on May 23, 2002, at 19:23:38

Strange how perfectly innocuous words can take on vulgar connotations depending on who uses them. Certain words start out innocent enough but become taboo depending on their origins.

As Beire-dei no doubt knows, many Old Germanic words were considered more coarse & vulgar when the Normans conquered England. Norman French became the artistocrastic language & the shorter blunter Germanic languages became that of the "lower" class. The word 'shit' came from a perfectly acceptable Old Norse (or other Germanic word) for excrement. Even though the word 'nigger' came from Spanish & before that Latin, meaning black, even back then its connotation wasn't meant just to describe skin colour but was meant to denote someone beneath the 'pure' white's consideration.

 

Re: cc to me too, me too! i wanna know! (nm) » krazy kat

Posted by Zo on May 24, 2002, at 4:14:13

In reply to personal to kid_a... » kid_A, posted by krazy kat on May 23, 2002, at 19:23:38

 

really interesting...thanks... (nm) » IsoM

Posted by krazy kat on May 24, 2002, at 11:40:51

In reply to origins of taboo words..., posted by IsoM on May 24, 2002, at 0:00:24

 

Re: sorry

Posted by Dr. Bob on May 24, 2002, at 16:29:50

In reply to Re: dangerous territory » Dr. Bob, posted by krazy kat on May 23, 2002, at 10:03:28

> I'm obviously a glutton for punishment. I thought I worked pretty well on my arguments and their presentations for this concern.
>
> It feels as if you have a personal dislike of me, Dr. B. Or perhaps I just can't cut it as a reasonable poster here.
>
> But, no matter. I'll refrain from offering my opinion for awhile as it just seems to get me hurt.

Your arguments were fine, I think we may just disagree on what kind of balance to try for. Sorry to have hurt you, I certainly didn't mean to. And I don't dislike you, either! :-)

Bob

 

Re: origins of taboo words...

Posted by susan C on May 24, 2002, at 17:59:26

In reply to origins of taboo words..., posted by IsoM on May 24, 2002, at 0:00:24

in Japan, the decendants of butchers and tanners were stigmatized by their ancestor's involvement with something this Buddist society considered profane: The carcasses of animals....Menial labor....so there is no excape for the burakumin....the translation of the word..."village people". The word when written in Chinese characters? "Excessive filth"
--Gary Katzenstein, Funny Business an Outsider's Year in Japan

 

Re: Zo writes to Lou » Lou Pilder

Posted by Zo on May 24, 2002, at 21:15:55

In reply to Thank you Dinah 1 » Dinah1, posted by Lou Pilder on May 23, 2002, at 7:57:17

Lou,

I think one of the important things here is that you don't end up feeing persecuted, and certainly not for your religious beliefs. I think that tends to get lost, that people do have respect and affection. . .it's just that the Message is really driving them nuts, Lou! Repitition is a pretty irritating thing!

Clearly you are a good man, and I have enjoyed some of your stories so much, but I think if you aren't careful, you could end up putting people *off* the Spirit. . .

And you know what would be really helpful? People would like to hear more from you than just the one thing.

It would be good to offer a variety of helpful ideas and suggestions.

Otherwise, you inadvertently end up leaving non-believers out in the cold. . .feeling unsupported.

You know, even Christ went easy--He gave people help, yes, but he gave it in the form *they* needed. When someone was hurting, he just responded. He didn't use that moment to preach, and by this compassionate example. .. well, isn't it really this that really wins hearts and minds?

I think it would work better to go on writing in your Gate threads--and respond to posts with the focus of being sensitive to that person's needs (which are usually expressed in their post, or one of their previous posts in the thread) at that moment.

Hope this helps,
Zo

 

Re: Zo writes to Lou:Lou writes back to Zo » Zo

Posted by Lou Pilder on May 26, 2002, at 0:25:16

In reply to Re: Zo writes to Lou » Lou Pilder, posted by Zo on May 24, 2002, at 21:15:55

Zo,
Now after I was in the City of Peace, I read the Bible about the jesus person in it. I remeber didtinctly that he did preach to people. Also,you say that he went easy. Not from what I remember in my reading of the bible. He said, "Unless you repent you will perish." He said, "If you do not forgive men, your Father in heaven will not forgive you." He said, don't fear man that can kill the body, but fear him that can cast your soul and body into hell." And he said, You seek after worldly goods. Store up treasures in heaven where moths and rust and theives will not get them." He said, "but I say into you, unless a man be born again, he can not enter the kingdom of God.
Lou

 

Admin TOO??!?!??!!!!??!?!?!?!?! (nm) » Lou Pilder

Posted by kiddo on May 26, 2002, at 0:36:18

In reply to Re: Zo writes to Lou:Lou writes back to Zo » Zo, posted by Lou Pilder on May 26, 2002, at 0:25:16

 

Re: Elvis is everywhere in the building. (nm) » kiddo

Posted by Zo on May 26, 2002, at 2:53:45

In reply to Admin TOO??!?!??!!!!??!?!?!?!?! (nm) » Lou Pilder, posted by kiddo on May 26, 2002, at 0:36:18

 

ROFL (nm) » Zo

Posted by kiddo on May 26, 2002, at 3:37:38

In reply to Re: Elvis is everywhere in the building. (nm) » kiddo, posted by Zo on May 26, 2002, at 2:53:45

 

Ooh a joke. And I missed it. :( » kiddo

Posted by dinah 2 on May 26, 2002, at 9:20:51

In reply to ROFL (nm) » Zo, posted by kiddo on May 26, 2002, at 3:37:38

Perhaps you or Zo would care to explain it to the board? I'm afraid I chose not to see the humor, but perhaps you could explain why it was funny.

 

Re: Admin TOO??!?!??!!!!??!?!?!?!?! » kiddo

Posted by Lou Pilder on May 26, 2002, at 9:47:06

In reply to Admin TOO??!?!??!!!!??!?!?!?!?! (nm) » Lou Pilder, posted by kiddo on May 26, 2002, at 0:36:18

Kiddo,
Could you clarify what "Admin TOO" means in your title? If you clarify that, then I can have an understanding of what your mean by it and then I could respond to you. Your cooperation in clarifying would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Lou

 

Re: What I meant » Lou Pilder

Posted by kiddo on May 26, 2002, at 11:10:56

In reply to Re: Admin TOO??!?!??!!!!??!?!?!?!?! » kiddo, posted by Lou Pilder on May 26, 2002, at 9:47:06

Lou-

What I meant is simply this:

Your continuous threads on the subject have overwhelmed me on Social so much that I find it extremely difficult to post there anymore....now I feel like it's starting here too.


I'm not bashing, discriminating, trying to 'segregate', or anything else. You asked, I answered.


Kiddo

 

Re: Ooh a joke. » dinah 2

Posted by kiddo on May 26, 2002, at 11:20:25

In reply to Ooh a joke. And I missed it. :( » kiddo, posted by dinah 2 on May 26, 2002, at 9:20:51

Dinah-

I found it funny for the simple fact I had just watched 3000 Miles to Graceland, and I an entirl 'Fleet' of flying "Elvi' were swarming the building....

This is getting bad when I can't even laugh. I mean you know offense, Dinah, but this entire thing is getting to me

Still friends, I hope-
Kiddo

 

Re: What I meant » kiddo

Posted by Lou Pilder on May 26, 2002, at 11:21:31

In reply to Re: What I meant » Lou Pilder, posted by kiddo on May 26, 2002, at 11:10:56

Kiddo,
I have suggested that there be a quota of 10 posts per day for each poster. What do you think of my sugggestion?
Lou

 

Disagree » Lou Pilder

Posted by kiddo on May 26, 2002, at 12:10:17

In reply to Re: What I meant » kiddo, posted by Lou Pilder on May 26, 2002, at 11:21:31

Why limit the posts to 10 per day? I saw your suggestion, but I fail to see the good in it.

Kiddo

 

Re: Perhaps I misunderstood » kiddo

Posted by dinah final on May 26, 2002, at 16:42:01

In reply to Re: Ooh a joke. » dinah 2, posted by kiddo on May 26, 2002, at 11:20:25

I had assumed, kiddo, that your admin remark, zo's reply, and your laughter were related. In which case it appeared to me to be unkind.

And perhaps you read my post where I said that what was done to any of my brothers, I would also consider done unto me?

But if you say the three posts were not related and your laughter was solely due to the vision of multiple Elvises, then I of course believe you and apologize for misunderstanding.

 

Misunderstood » dinah final

Posted by kiddo on May 26, 2002, at 17:00:18

In reply to Re: Perhaps I misunderstood » kiddo, posted by dinah final on May 26, 2002, at 16:42:01

Yes Dinah, unfortunately, you did misunderstand me. I thought you knew me well enough to know I don't "laugh" at people

Yes, I saw the part about your brother and it being done unto you.

Yes, I said they were not related except for the fact there were Evis' involved-


Kiddo

 

Then I of course apologize. (nm) » kiddo

Posted by dinah final on May 26, 2002, at 17:07:20

In reply to Misunderstood » dinah final, posted by kiddo on May 26, 2002, at 17:00:18

 

sorry to you too kiddo

Posted by dinah yet again on May 26, 2002, at 19:27:15

In reply to Misunderstood » dinah final, posted by kiddo on May 26, 2002, at 17:00:18

of course i know your intentions were fine. if you would like my new email address please let me know. otherwise i won't bother you with it.

 

Re: sorry to you too kiddo

Posted by dinah yet again on May 26, 2002, at 19:32:34

In reply to sorry to you too kiddo, posted by dinah yet again on May 26, 2002, at 19:27:15

sorry if i have offended you with the offer. i will close that account as well.

 

Re: sorry

Posted by kiddo on May 26, 2002, at 20:51:41

In reply to sorry to you too kiddo, posted by dinah yet again on May 26, 2002, at 19:27:15

Dinah-

You have apologized to me, offered me your email address, apologized again, and then said you were going to close that account before I even had it...there's no need to close it, yes I would like to have it and please let me have the opportunity to respond first :-)

I'm sorry too if what I said offended you....


Kiddo


This is the end of the thread.


Show another thread

URL of post in thread:


Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ


[dr. bob] Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD, bob@dr-bob.org

Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.